dallen

joined 2 years ago
[–] dallen@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Yes, only European cities covered by Eurostat. I tried to cover this in the about section but it basically boils down to processing time, my own available time and to a lesser extent storage.

It took me more than a week to process 2013-2023 for the included areas, which is roughly 10TB of raw imagery (with less than 60% cloud cover).

The Eurostat urban extents, for the most part, delineate urban areas with a detailed vector dataset. This is something that I also couldn’t find on a global scale.

I’m not decided yet on expanding the extents, which also depends on if people actually find this useful. However, it is open source (AGPL) so it can easily be forked and adapted.

[–] dallen@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

If you’re willing to share OS/browser that could help :)

I’m on the fence with adding Sentry as I was hoping to keep the project very privacy minded.

[–] dallen@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Do you mind sharing the OS? This was developed on Firefox (Debian & iOS).

I don’t know if your WebGL is working correctly but I could try to add a check (and thus a more graceful failure mode).

Thank you for the report!

[–] dallen@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

It’s admittedly less obvious on mobile.

[–] dallen@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Sorry, you currently need to click to load another area. You can also navigate with the search bar or randomize by clicking the city icon.

I do want to load things automatically but need to figure out how to avoid hogging to much resources for contouring on the users device.

This is the first time sharing this, so a bit of an early release 😅

[–] dallen@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

I plan to pay for Immich

[–] dallen@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

I’m really hoping for the 3D options. If OpenSCAD isn’t a good fit then I still boot to Windows for CAD :(

[–] dallen@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ve had a particularly difficult time with CUDA/Pytorch in WSL. Also with Windows not reclaiming memory…

But don’t get me wrong, WSL has helped a lot when I’ve needed to use Windows at work.

[–] dallen@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

In my experience:

  • No lockfile, and using the third party conda-lock is clunky
  • Painfully slow solver, although the libmamba solver came to the rescue
  • Conda-forge can lag behind pypi by weeks, depending on the package
[–] dallen@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Interesting, but if I have to use Windows then I would consider Conda depending on my dependency situation.

I don’t particularly like Conda, or Windows, but what I like even less is manually finding wheels for my project. For something like GDAL, I wouldn’t even try on Windows without Conda. I think it’s also easy for a beginner to get up and running with this setup.

My preferred setup is pyenv on Linux with poetry :)

[–] dallen@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

I remember getting a Ubuntu CD box set many years ago when I ordered free disks in the mail as a teenager. The box was well constructed, prints of high quality and the CD labels were especially sharp.

Crazy how physical media was king back then.

[–] dallen@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

After getting used to the vanilla Gnome flow, at home and at work, even MacOS starts to feel a bit clunky.

Love the minimalism of Gnome with the stability of Debian.

view more: ‹ prev next ›