dead

I was confused about that too but it actually links to a hexbear thread being viewed through lemmygrad's website. I don't know why they are browsing hexbear through lemmygrad and then posting it to lemmy.world.

This is the thread that was linked by lemmy.world. https://hexbear.net/post/2686688

This video answers the question on why waffle house has so much violence. It has interviews with waffle house workers trying to unionize. Video is age gated for violence. (content warning)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p85ugE6Oj60

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=p85ugE6Oj60

I'm not very surprised. He's aligned with Jackson Hinkle.

https://nitter.poast.org/MidwesternMarx/status/1435038558717419525

I think DPRK sending trash balloons to South Korea in response to South Korea's propaganda leaflets is an incredible power move.

How can they call their channel "Boy Boy" and not be gay? The phrase "boy boy" is an answer to the question "What is a gay couple?"

Americans are told since birth that all lawsuits are frivolous. There is a broadly accepted narrative that any lawsuit is meant for one person to get rich and that it will hurt the broader public. This is a narrative that was part of Reaganism, similar to Reagan's "welfare queen" narrative. Republicans love tort reform. Basically right wingers push the idea that consumer protection lawsuits are frivolous so that the public gets mad about it and then capitalists never face legal consequences for defrauding people.

The lawsuit in the article is a class action lawsuit, that means that the lawsuit is on behalf of a larger party, not just the person filing the lawsuit.

You can read the filed lawsuit here. https://interactive.wtsp.com/pdfs/hershey-lawsuit-PACER.pdf

On page 12 of the document, it says that the lawsuit is on behalf of "All consumers within the State of Florida who purchased one of Products, as detailed herein, within the statute of limitations period". On page 16 of the document, it says the that the lawsuit seeks "Awarding Plaintiff and the members of the Class compensatory damages in an amount according to proof at trial" and "Ordering Defendant to correct the deceptive behavior"

If the lawsuit is successful, it means that people in Florida who have purchased a reeses product recently will receive some sort of compensation and that Hershey's will required to have more accurate packaging in the future.

If you read the very first sentence of the article, it says that the lawsuit is a "class action lawsuit". Now I'm no lawyer but I know that a class action lawsuit means that the lawsuit is on behalf of a larger party. In this particular lawsuit, I would think that it would mean that the lawsuit is in defense of any person who has ever purchased a reeses product.

Here is the filed legal document of the document. Turn to page 12. https://interactive.wtsp.com/pdfs/hershey-lawsuit-PACER.pdf

The filed lawsuit document says that the lawsuit is on behalf of "All consumers within the State of Florida who purchased one of Products, as detailed herein, within the statute of limitations period". This means that if the lawsuit is successful, anyone in the state of Florida who has purchased a reeses product within the statute of limitation will be entitled to receive compensation. In conclusion, I believe that the lawsuit isn't "just looking for a way to make some money", because the lawsuit is meant to compensate every person who was duped by a reeses product.

What you said was incredibly reactionary. The narrative that people are trying to get rich on frivolous lawsuits was Reaganist policy. Tort law reform is a core principle of the Republican party. Right wingers have propagandized people into believing that consumer protection lawsuits are bad because they don't want capitalists to be able to face legal consequences.

Yes. I posted the article because I agree with it. I like posting good articles from the DPRK.

Fun fact, in 2015 the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton Campaign told liberal media to popularize Donald Trump because they said he would be easy to defeat. The Republican party had rejected Trump at the time because he was seen as an outsider. If it had not been for Liberal media, he probably would have never been elected president.

https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/
https://media.salon.com/2016/11/pied-piper-dnc-email.png

"We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously"

You can still see the videos of Liberal media promoting Trump in 2015 on mainstream Liberal media youtube channels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQv54IQoN2M (CNN) Best Trump Zingers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdyeGxgbtxQ Anderson Cooper interviews Donald Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXtiuJk07UM Morning Joe interviews Donald Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF9WE395KYo "Summer of Trump" 2015 compilation of MSNBC clips promoting Donald Trump

This is just a few example, you can go to the CNN or MSNBC youtube channel and search "Trump 2015" and there's dozens of videos. MSNBC and CNN promoted Trump for several months during 2015.

I didn't think much of that because 2 days ago Trump trump referenced Mother Theresa in a press statement. In hindsight, it is a bizarre sign.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5119040/trump-mother-teresa-beat-charges-jury-begins-deliberations

If you had known that it was fake yesterday, you would have told people. You're just posturing like you knew all along to sound smart. Hindsight is 20/20

"I knew it was fake all along" Yeah okay. Even the other trump supporters outside the Trial didn't recognize that he was an agitator.

This is not true. There were plenty of actual Trump supporters at the trial behaving in a similar way. It just happens that this specific guy was actor who was pranking the rest of them. You can see all the other Trump supporters behaving weirdly in the video.