discocactus

Don't ban them, but tax them like the businesses they are.

He's an absolute knob but this is actually sort of a real thing: WINDExchange: Wind Turbine Radar Interference https://windexchange.energy.gov/projects/radar-interference

A competing entity as well. Curious.

I mean strategically good and morally good are often completely different.

But in NYC: Mayor of New York City - Wikipedia https://share.google/X5YRgBrWjdwhEK7o1

What does NYC's mayor control? A look at which powers the office does, and does not, hold. - CBS New York https://share.google/RCzPsITmolAMyzPPy

Classic monkeys paw wish. I want "American fascist hegemony and industrial culture to collapse"..."wait, not like that...''

It's not useful enough yet. But when it's the only way to interface with the new Internet, it will be by default.

It's hard to see it as anything other than an effective PR campaign for his personal brand. Which likely benefited more than the users of the service. There's a fine line between not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good and also not letting a money hoarding swindler rehabilitate their actions with token gestures. Idk.

Lol wut. The people who have proven with their actions consistently that they are willing to fuck everyone else over to get ahead, again and again? Would switch sides as they're about to make the winning dunk on the underclass?

It's actually fuck's sakes. Try to get an AI to be that pedantic.

This is exactly what my friend who was a copywriter told me several years ago; now he manages the company's AI production pipeline. They mostly do b2b. But essentially, the AI even then could produce stuff that was 80% good for 10% of the money, and infinitely quicker and scalable. And that's plenty good for what they're doing. So several people lost their jobs, the content quality drops, but the C suite makes money and nobody cares about the "craftsmanship" of the work.

It's the reason why we've moved to data centers over physical hardware for people. Control.