echo

joined 2 years ago
[–] echo@lemmings.world 24 points 3 days ago

What kind of bullshit excuse is that?

[–] echo@lemmings.world 7 points 6 days ago

I use cast iron on electric and am 100% happy with both. I have a mix of pans that I bought new and acquired used. One of them was quite rough and I restored it. I find them extremely easy to use and cleanup.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

Asbestos in the attic. As long as you leave it alone it'll leave you alone. Can't say the same for a person...

[–] echo@lemmings.world 10 points 1 week ago

No surprise. He's a corporate shill.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 3 points 1 week ago

How are they losing their account in the first place?

[–] echo@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm going to go out on a limb and say, "The other half..."

(Not projecting any agreement; only stating the obvious.)

[–] echo@lemmings.world 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What he means is that when the chain of command orders it, it's lawful. He's wrong, but that is what he means.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Every first episodes of Star Trek series rather suck.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Then maybe get a fucking clue?

[–] echo@lemmings.world 230 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Oh fuck off, asshole... you need to be thrown in prison.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

What do you want to talk about, then?

let’s circlejerk about MAGA.

I agree. There's no debate to be had. Just like there is no debate to be had about whether vaccines cause autism. However, you are refusing to engage. You could have said, "Yes, MAGA is awful and that's not the conversation I'd like to have. However, you didn't do that. You literally (intentionally or unintentionally) defended MAGA and then complained again that there just isn't any nuance.

You aren't seeing nuanced conversations because you're watching one side disavow law, science, and decency and then pretending that we should give a rat's ass what they have to say.

Again... you're asking for rational people to play a high-stakes game of chess with a pigeon and then getting upset that, instead, they shoo away the pigeon. You need to respond that you understand this, that you disagree with it, or something. Again, your very behaviors are why you're not seeing nuanced conversations -- giving you the benefit of the doubt that this is actually what you want.

[–] echo@lemmings.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And, I propose that what you are doing is part of the problem and why you're not seeing the nuanced conversation you're seeking. You're literally making excuses and space for MAGA. You are deflecting and changing the topic. You are coming across as disingenuous. Part of having a nuanced conversation is that you must participate in it and do so in good-faith. Don't waste my or anyone else's time with this virtue signaling. You are why people aren't having the conversation you profess to want to see happening. Any further questions?

view more: next ›