If you're (sensibly) encrypting your data before sending it off site, then yes it likely makes little difference where you send it. The parent comment didn't mention adding your own crypto however.
Further, I just personally wouldn't trust my data to a personality like "Kim dot com".
Didn't realise we were using Luigi as a verb now.
I'm on board with the vernacular.
This is a ridiculous take.
If a swat team comes into your house, shooting at them is absolutely not going to lead to a better outcome.
I wouldn't touch MEGA with a ten foot pole.
I'd also argue BitWarden shits on Keepass for UX.
Mullvad has amazing privacy credentials that are third party audited.
In terms of anonymity, you can literally send them cash via post to protect your identity.
I recommend them to everyone.
I strongly recommend Mullvad. Exceptional performance, wireguard support and if you're really paranoid about anonymity you can literally send them money via post.
Even for the technically literate, running a mail server is an ongoing nightmare. If you think it's easy, you're not doing it right.
From a UX perspective I disagree. 1password wins at UX hands down but Bitwarden is a very close second and IMO has better privacy guarantees.
Security is useless if it's too difficult. Despite liking Bitwarden I am a 1Password subscriber and happy with my choice.
Anti-depressants.
supposed "civilians"
Children? Seriously?
I'm from Australia.
Some spiders are absolutely bros.
Others seem to exist only to fuck you up.
Once you know the difference you're fine, but I don't blanket assume that every spider I find is a friend.