eurisko

I cannot — I performatively refuse to — believe that the meaning of « genocide », « fascism » and « nazi » — dogmas that shaped the fundamental beliefs of many generations —would be controversial again.

Absolutely. Money is a signifier that only has meaning when integrated in material exchanges. Radical, bold restructurations are needed in order to ameliorate our country's socioeconomic reality.

We have experienced a very strange situation where the cons (unfortunately) fared far better than it ever did in its modern iteration while losing its momentous advantage, meaning that there is still somewhat of a reason for Poilièvre to stay in the race. He is also very arrogant, so he will not back down easily.

This right here. This principle is baked into its very core. We know exactly what to do to counter that. It's not rocket science: We need to do away with tricklenomics, and speculative economy and start taxing the ultrarich, and imposing limits to their reach.

Yeah, a bit early, I know.

The low low rating of... checks note 40 something percent? How is it not rock-bottom already ? Imagine a stock-market crash under Biden. He'd be already impeached and looking for a job.

But does it break when water ?

Absolutely.

It's an interesting spin, I think. I believe it is supposed to represent masculinity minus its associated « oppressive qualities ». Male existence is often construed as an abject repulsion of what menaces its dominion as a class (the reason why male homosexuality is a particular object of hate). The problem with those depictions, of course, is its reification of sexual orientations and gender expressions.

I find that for the purpose of my projects (narrative building, tabletop rpg simulation) gemma3:14b (with low temperature) works perfectly to create consistent psychological overviews.

Oh boy, I can smell all your issues from here.