fallaciousreasoning

joined 2 years ago
[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 month ago

Man, that's a sick shot!

 

Martin van Beynen is a Press journalist and regular opinion contributor.

OPINION: When a political party becomes amusing fodder for columnists it really is in serious trouble.

Te Pāti Māori has this year lurched from one disaster to another, which, to be fair, does not make it that dissimilar to other New Zealand parties. However, it was supposed to be different, especially with its tikanga approach to resolving tensions and disagreements.

Well, the approach revealed in the last few days is brutal.

A showdown must have been brewing for some time, but let’s start with Te Pāti Māori demoting whip Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, regarded as the party MP most respectful of Parliament’s processes. Her son Eru, formerly the party’s vice-president and a spokesman for the Toitū te Tiriti movement, then broke ties with the party, saying the leadership had become dictatorial and toxic.

This week party management sent an email to members and either leaked it to the media, or knew, as sure as eggs, that it would find its way there. The email showed Kapa-Kingi’s office was heading towards a budget blow-out and that Eru had allegedly said some nasty, entitled and ethnically disparaging things to a parliamentary security guard.

This could be regarded as Te Pāti Māori being transparent and honest with its members and electorates, except for two things. The first is that the party is not that open. It dictates who it speaks to and what questions it will answer. It is very good at shutting up shop when it suits.

Secondly, the party has been aware, as Stuff’s political correspondent Glenn McConnell has pointed out, of the issues with the Kapa-Kingis for months and yet has waited until now to have a crack under the guise of openness.

All this is entertaining and great material for Māori bashers, but is very sad for people who want to see Māori do well.

New Te Pāti Māori MP Oriini Kaipara did not help things last week by breaching the time limit for her maiden speech, which was followed by a haka in the public gallery.

However, she warrants a bit of slack. Parliament can spare a few extra minutes and Kaipara spoke impressively. The singing from the public gallery was beautiful. Perhaps we didn’t need the history lesson and we could have done without the haka, but she looks very much like a leader of the future.

I’m not sure what ails Te Pāti Māori, but it needs to sort out a few things if it is going to look like a credible partner in any government.

The first is ensuring relatives are not in key positions in the party or on the payroll. President John Tamihere is the father of TPM’s general manager Dr Kiri Tamihere-Waititi, described as a “relentless force in her husband’s success and probably more liberated”. Tamihere-Waititi is married to the party’s co-leader, Rawiri Waititi.

Then we have Mariameno Kapa-Kingi engaging her son as a contractor. She’s not the first MP to hire family, but it’s never a good idea because it leads to conflicts of interest and looks terrible.

The second is doing the mahi. MPs are paid to do a job and that job entails being, well, a member of Parliament. It’s long been said by political reporters that Te Pāti Māori leaders have a sniffy attitude to Parliament and have made little effort to be good parliamentarians.

The attendance of Te Pāti Māori MPs is patchy at best and protocols and rules are continually breached. One observer noted that Te Pāti Māori MPs are “quite content to use Parliament as a soundstage for its social media content. It’s far from the first political party to do this – but it’s the first party that only uses the House for this purpose.”

MPs are paid $168,000 a year. Taxpayers, who include grassroots Māori, deserve better. With all the problems that beset Māori, it was instructive to visit the party’s website this week to see what it is currently campaigning about. The first featured campaign was a petition to “Say No to the FBI in Aotearoa”.

Finally, the party needs consistency. Take the approach to the Instagram post from Te Tai Tonga MP Tākuta Ferris, that accused Labour of using “Indians, Asians, Black and Pākehā” supporters to “take a Māori seat from Māori”.

The party’s co-leaders were disapproving, but Tamihere told Radio Waatea “what Tākuta Ferris said, in substance, was right”.

Looking at the party’s implosion from the outside, it seems it needs more of a clean-out than a reset.

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey mate, agree with the sentiment but the analogy is maybe a bit strong.

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, seems kinda fair enough that he's being prosecuted for this. We don't really want to be encouraging this kind of thing.

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

Article text, as its paywalled: Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said he will try to prevail upon the Auckland Council and Housing Minister Chris Bishop to make changes to the city’s new draft plan, which will reshape the city’s skyline, enabling 2 million homes.

He supported changes that would scale back plans to intensify areas of the city with old, poor infrastructure, such as Parnell.

Seymour said the new plan was flawed and has said he will lobby for changes – he told a public meeting last week that he and supporters must “impress” on Bishop “that this plan is not necessary, and will have negative unintended consequences“.

The remarks have echoes of the tiff between Act and National in opposition, when Act opposed the Medium-Density Residential Standard (MDRS), which came about as a result of a deal between National and Labour.

Seymour’s public opposition to those rules saw National’s Auckland MPs put under pressure to also oppose the policy. National eventually changed tack, and in 2023 took a policy to the election that allowed councils to opt out of the rules if they zoned for more housing in other ways.

Seymour told the Herald his opposition to this draft plan was different from the scrap over the MDRS, and that he supported large parts of the new plan, including allowing more development around transit corridors and around train stations.

David Seymour says the Auckland plans "will have negative unintended consequences". David Seymour says the Auckland plans "will have negative unintended consequences".

Where the Act leader does have concerns is with development in areas which he believed had inadequate infrastructure, or in places where development could be patchy: it would make no sense to have three tall residential tower blocks surrounded by villas in Parnell, for instance.

Seymour told the Herald that “Chris [Bishop] has done a good job restoring some common sense to housing policy, particularly by removing the previous Government’s one-size-fits-all intensification rules. That was a big step forward”.

“At the same time, there’s always room to improve policy,” Seymour said.

“As a local electorate MP, I’m helping the Government by conveying my constituents’ concerns, and many are deeply concerned about whether infrastructure can cope with more intensification.

“They’ve seen serious flood damage, a major sewer-related sinkhole, and sewage leaking on to the shoreline. Understandably, they want to know that growth will be properly supported,” he said.

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown pushed back, saying, “If David Seymour was really interested in improving things for Auckland, he would support the bed-night visitor levy, which even most Act voters support.”

‘This plan is not necessary, and will have negative unintended consequences’ - Seymour Seymour made these criticisms known at a community meeting in Mt Eden last week.

Though he did not attend the meeting personally, because he was in Australia, Seymour had a message read to attendees, which said he and supporters “must impress on the minister, Chris Bishop, that this plan is not necessary, and will have negative unintended consequences”.

“Over the next few weeks, I will be transmitting that impression on behalf of my constituents, and I ask for your support in doing so,” he said.

Seymour’s message said, “Zoning more housing capacity well ahead of demand and, more importantly, infrastructure capacity, is a poor way to address housing affordability”.

On Friday, Seymour has a sold-out meeting scheduled in Parnell to discuss opposition to plans for the suburb.

The event description, on Seymour’s personal website, notes that Parnell’s infrastructure “is plainly not up to such intensification”.

“I also believe it will bring a significant change to the character of New Zealand’s oldest suburb.

“I need your support to pressure council to amend its plan to preserve the unique character of our suburb. This is urgent,” it said.

Seymour has another similar meeting scheduled in Remuera next week.

Two million homes claim ‘frankly nuts’ – Bishop The Government has been taking heat in Auckland over the draft plan changes. The plan would allow Auckland to opt out of the controversial MDRS, which freed up large swathes of the city for three-storey townhouses.

Auckland Council was unhappy with those rules, and was particularly concerned it would see upzoning and densification to parts of the city vulnerable to hazards like flooding.

The new proposal has scaled that back, but has upzoned parts of the city further.

The council’s draft replacement plan includes allowance for 10- and 15-storey apartments in 44 town centres and along transport corridors, and will mean a loss of kauri villas and bungalows, to the chagrin of some current residents.

Bishop responded to some of the criticism in an opinion piece published in the Herald today.

The Housing Minister said the reality of the council’s proposal was “much less dramatic” than the desecration of tree-lined suburbs and raw sewage flowing into the harbour envisaged by some of the plan’s critics.

Bishop said the city’s housing was “unaffordable” and the council needed to zone for more housing. He said the new proposal was a “big step forward” from the MDRS and the plan that would have forced those standards upon the city.

The minister noted the council had itself asked the Government to put it back in the driving seat of plan changes, and the Government had agreed to that request.

He also said he wanted the council to think more about expanding outwards – something Seymour told the Herald he also supports.

“[T]he current council has a weird aversion to new greenfield housing – big new subdivisions on the city fringe.

“I am in favour of new greenfield housing, where the infrastructure costs can be recovered from new residents – and in my view, the council should be zoning more for this sort of housing. The new draft plan is a missed opportunity, but it is a draft – and they have a chance to improve it,” he wrote.

Bishop said the concern that the plan change would see two million homes drop from the sky was “frankly nuts”, as many of these homes would not get built or would take some time to get built.

“Almost 10 years later [since the Auckland Unitary Plan in 2016], only around 10% of that enabled capacity has actually turned into new housing. The idea that a plan change that enables two million homes is suddenly going to result in two million homes being built in the short-term is, frankly, nuts,” Bishop wrote.

Next steps The current plan is a draft. A final draft is set to be released in September, and if the council proceeds, there will be further chances for input from the public.

The law change – supported by Act – that made the MDRS optional, and kick-started the plan change process, puts Bishop in the position of being the arbiter of whether what the council was doing was sufficient.

Seymour told last week’s meeting that while the council had been given a deadline for the plan changes, “the only consequence for not meeting it is that the minister may intervene, or not”.

There appears to be almost no chance that Bishop would not intervene if the council failed to meet the deadline.

The council has until October 10 to withdraw all or part of the current plan and replace it with a new one that meets the density requirements set out by Bishop in legislation.

Councillors are set to vote on September 24 on whether to proceed with the draft replacement plan or the existing one.

 

Sorry for the editorialized title - seems a bit hypocritical for a libertarian though

 

Fairly scathing

 

The websites look pretty slick too

3
Wherefore now with KiwiRail (adventuresintransitland.substack.com)
 

"Ditch the winter chill” and “expand your horizons in sunny South East Queensland!” reads one newspaper advert, luring New Zealand’s health-care workers towards a new life in Australia. “Warmer days and higher pays”, enthused another, last year, from the Australian state’s police service. Kiwis who chose “policing in paradise” could look forward to 300 days of annual sunshine and a A$20,000 ($12,500) relocation bonus, it declared.

For many New Zealanders that is an easy sell. They are leaving their country in record numbers. Almost 129,000 residents emigrated last year—40% above the pre-pandemic average for this century. It is not a case of last in, first out. The majority of those leaving were New Zealanders, rather than immigrants returning home, creating a net loss of 47,000 citizens.

New Zealand, though a settler country, is also shaped by emigration. Its small economy and relative lack of opportunity have long driven young New Zealanders towards what they call the “overseas experience”, fanning fears of brain drain. Proportionate to its population of 5.3m, it has one of the largest diasporas in the OECD, a club of mostly rich countries. Emigration ebbs and flows: the last spike occurred in 2012, near the end of the financial crisis. As the pandemic raged, many expats returned to hunker behind closed borders, but the outflow quickly resumed. Recently, New Zealand has been in a rut. The economy is in recession and unemployment has risen. Outgoing Kiwis grumble about costly housing and a crime surge.

Unlike most, they have an alternative when times get tough: they are free to live and work in Australia, and vice versa. Almost 15% of them are now based “across the ditch”. It is not just that Australia’s economy has weathered the cost-of-living crisis better. The income gap between the pair has been growing for decades. Adjusted for purchasing power, Australia’s per person GDP is about a third higher than New Zealand’s. Its pensions are more generous, and its centre-left Labor government has made it easier for Kiwis to get passports and benefits. By comparison, New Zealand is “a sinking boat”, says one transplant on a Facebook group for Kiwi expats. Australia is “best for [an] easy life”, writes another.

In the past, fears of brain drain have proved overblown. Young expats have generally returned, and governments have offset losses by letting in immigrants from countries such as India and China. The result was a “brain exchange”, says Paul Spoonley, a sociologist at New Zealand’s Massey University. But there is a risk of that changing, he argues. First, he says, it is no longer just young New Zealanders who are leaving, but more experienced professionals and extended families. Second, inward immigration is now slowing. After a post-pandemic spike, it plunged by around a third last year, though the population is still growing. Christopher Luxon, the prime minister, says the solution is “to build a long-term proposition where New Zealanders actually choose to stay”. But that has not proved easy. In 2009 John Key, then prime minister, set out to “match Australia by 2025”. In Wellington, the capital, some now joke that a more realistic goal would be to “beat Fiji by 2050”.

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah agreed, its definitely not fantastic :/

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Hey mate you make some good points, but you're coming across pretty strong here - do you reckon you could tone it down a little: https://lemmy.nz/post/63098

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.nz/post/19902182

The Ahuriri valley, NZ

Funnily enough, that's exactly why I was digging in to it

 
[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Try this Brave Search Goggle I made, which searches a bunch of NZ companies and retailers (not all of it is NZ gear, and some of it is made by an NZ company overseas, like Macpac, Kathmandu ect).

Some of the companies I came across when putting it together:

(the full list of NZ sites in the goggle is here)

Sorry, most of it is more outdoor focused than everyday

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically was pretty easy but there was quite a bit of snow on the ridge (pretty consistently waist to chest deep) so it was super slow going. Next time I think we'd try go up one of the faces so we could skin up but the avvy danger was a bit higher than we would've liked, so we stuck to the ridge, which was super ploddy :D

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ohau is a bit of a hidden gem in NZ - sneaks in between the way more touristy Mt Cook and Queenstown. Well worth a visit if you find yourself over here!

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago

Also, if you tap with two fingers you jump

[–] fallaciousreasoning@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago

To see how far down you can get.

view more: next ›