fishtacos

joined 2 years ago
[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I'm gonna need some real sources for this... And maybe even a definition.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

You would need an example to talk about that.

You smooth brains really stretch far for a meme eh?

Dam, I feel bad for people like you.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You just gave away you have no idea what communism is.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yikes, I was specifically referring to Muslims, but yeah looks like America isn't even better than that.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, insults, the highest form of conversation. Always indicates you are correct. Good job.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, because we aren't allowed to compare things right? It would be terrible if your country looked worse than the ones you demonize so hard.

Okay for me but not for thee

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

It was a neutral way to summarize a long article.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (19 children)

And the argument from ignorance continues.

All I have to say is read more and be online less.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (25 children)

So... No, it's not like Russia at all. But that nuance is too long for me to explain right now. Short answer is that Russia is capitalist, and China is 50/50 capitalist/socialist, depending on definitions, and yeah a lot of nuance.

But China is run by the people, their authoritarian politics keeps their billionaires and induatry in check. Their local politics is a negotiation with the national politics.

And... How exactly is China antagonizing nations abroad? Because a lot of countries are choosing to work with China because they AREN'T antagonizing them as much as America and Europe. So... The reality is the opposite.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago (60 children)

I found this to be a decent enough primer: https://medium.com/@bobbyarlan/a-case-study-in-racist-anti-chinese-sentiment-fuelled-by-american-bots-and-western-propaganda-f0a69978d568

A decent TLDR: The article argues that anti-Chinese propaganda spread by the U.S. and Western media is fueling racist sentiment. Claims of mass detention of Uyghurs are based on flawed studies and sources like Adrian Zenz, a far-right Christian fundamentalist. Atrocity propaganda is a common tactic used by the U.S. to justify wars. The U.S. is threatened by China's economic rise and technological progress, so it is trying to portray China negatively and prepare public opinion for a potential conflict. However, most of the world sees China positively and as an economic opportunity, making a new Cold War against China unlikely to succeed

In short, a lot of information about China that has come out of Western news media has been proven to be based on known biased sources, known anit-China rhetoric, and/or outright lies. It's difficult to prove/disprove of any information specifically, that takes time and reporting, but a lot of people see the anti-China pattern in BBC reporting, and tend to dismiss it because of known history.

[–] fishtacos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Wow, what? Communists talk openly about propaganda... You have no idea what you're talking about.

We are well aware what our biases are. We are trying to get westerners to see their own biases. Being called out as hypocrites feels like an attack, but when we say everyone have biases, we know it's true about us too.

Absorb news from a wide variety of sources, including sources from other countries, and you'll see that the BBC is in fact biased against China.

It takes time, and reading a lot, and you won't get it from Lemmy/Reddit/twitter(or X or whatever now)/FB. Even ground news only has so many sources. And you know what, the BBC does great coverage for a lot of things, they are a pretty high quality source for a lot of news. But yeah, everyone has biases, and the BBC is biased against China.

view more: next ›