fleabomber

joined 2 years ago
[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I'm about to give them some reasons.

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I thought they were crazy for coal.

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Ok, I'm with you.

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I fully admit that I'm no expert here, I'll have to look into it more. Thanks for the civil discussion.

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago

... were you going to add any information to the conversation or are you being ironic?

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Not that Tuberville isn't a POS but if it's critical to get these folks confirmed and you have a way to do it, get to fucking work. I'm tired of hearing that their hands are tied when they just need to roll up their sleeves.

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not really arguing about what needs to or should be done, I tend to agree with you.

However, my understanding is that sting operations start with a suspect already under investigation. They don't start with the sting. It's a pretty important distinction because otherwise you get into entrapment territory. We're interested in obtaining and and maintaining appeal proof convictions against wealthy and well defended people here.

If you want more direct scrutiny over congress critters, you need stronger ethics and disclosure laws to be passed with real teeth.

[–] fleabomber@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The idea is that we don't just investigate as fishing expeditions. Abscam wasn't created to go after political figures.

view more: ‹ prev next ›