glimmer_twin

joined 5 years ago
 

Long story short the stupid lefties are evil murderers because people that are anti capitalist must be the most reprehensible cold blooded killers in society.

But don’t worry cool edgy cop lady is here to stop them - damn cops are cool. But even better, before she was a cop she was a troop!

Honestly stunning that this shit is walking around masquerading as prestige TV. It’s a whole lot of “boomers be afraid at every waking moment, there could be a bomb under your toilet seat!!” mixed with “and the bomb was put there by your woke grandkids that never visit!” and “cop good!”

0/10 would not recommend unless you like to be angry about irrelevant aspects of our cultural silage heap

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I’m Don Draper in the elevator with that guy, the guy is 196 and I’m saying “I don’t think about you at all”

I literally don’t know what 196 is tbh

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I haaaaate raw onion. Love cooked onion tho.

 

Today I’m posting a picture of a media-obsessed anthropomorphic lizard. Oh and Gex I guess.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

In lotr the orcs are more technologically advanced than the humans, it was part of the unintentional WWI allegory that was going on

 

Our culture is diseased now but damn the post-9/11 zeitgeist was cursed as hell

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

I really don’t think so lol. The first five minutes of RoS is all the characters saying “hey the last movie didn’t happen, palpatine’s back, time to go on a quest for the 7 maguffins”. It’s not like JJ followed up any of the stuff TLJ was railroading the plot towards.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It wasn’t “good”, it’s blockbuster slop. I didn’t mind some of its ideas though, trying to take Star Wars away from “hey everything important that happens in this galaxy with a trillion trillion beings living in it revolves around this one family”. And then the 3rd sequel shat on that from a great height lol.

There was some cool looking stuff. The hoth remix with the red salt was cool. When the admiral blows up the whole fleet is cool. The lightsaber blowing up. I even thought the sequence where Luke “comes back” was kinda dope. However it also had some terrible action stuff like the horse race scene or whatever. And the plot was a contrived afterthought.

all that being said the sequels taken as a whole are a disgrace and this makes up a third of that disgrace so it’s hard to say it’s good, lol. It’s better than RoS by an order of magnitude, but that is literally one of the worst films I’ve ever seen.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Haitian rev? It opens up avenues to compare and contrast with the French and maybe even American revs, the French doing their bourgeois revolution then immediately turning round and trying to keep the Haitians as slaves and slapping them with “reparations” for successfully freeing themselves.

(Edit: bonus of this is nobody can come back at you calling you a dirty commie or mark you down because you call out the US for teaming up with nazis in Central America or whatever. Nobody is gonna say “umm actually the Haitians should’ve stayed as slaves”)

 

Reading it feels like nails on a chalkboard to me every time

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

And not even that, really. He thought it sucked they were fighting each other

 

Winston Churchill spoke of the need to introduce compulsory labour camps for "mental defectives" in the House of Commons in February 1911. In May 1912, a Private Members' Bill entitled the "Feeble-Minded Control Bill" was introduced in the House of Commons… It rejected sterilisation of the "feeble-minded", but had provision for registration and segregation.

The bill was withdrawn, but a government bill introduced on 10 June 1912 replaced it, which would become the Mental Deficiency Act 1913.

At the height of operation of the Mental Deficiency Act, 65,000 people were placed in "colonies" or in other institutional settings. The act remained in effect until it was repealed by the Mental Health Act 1959.

from another article:

The pages of Winston Churchill’s biography is a chapter short. Written by his son Randolph the sibling was too ashamed to go into any detail about the letter his father wrote to British statesman H.H. Asquith.

Behind the parotic speeches of fighting them on the beaches Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill fought another battle to keep the vulnerable out of sight hidden in the dunes.

In December 1910 the British PM sent a letter to Asquith stating: “The unnatural and increasingly rapid growth of the Feeble-Minded and Insane classes, coupled as it is with a steady restriction among all the thrifty, energetic and superior stocks, constitutes a national and race danger which it is impossible to exaggerate.”

When Churchill moved to the Liberal benches in 1904 he tried to push through tougher legislations for the “feeble minded” after researching a controversial act which was being carried out in Indiana.

The Eugenics Law made it compulsory for criminals and the mentally unfit to be sterilised, they were also not given the right to marry. Reading the act in a book written by Dr. H.C.Sharp Churchill asked the Home Office to put the laws into practice on these shores for the “Feeble-Minded” and research the legal requirements so he could introduce the sterilisation process.

His proposed actions were challenged by Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Horation Donkin who called the laws “The outcome of an arrogation of scientific knowledge by those who had no claim to it….It is a monument of ignorance and hopeless mental confusion.”

Churchill wasn’t one to back down. In 1910 he told the Government Britain’s 120,000 “feeble-minded “people should be “segregated under proper conditions so that their curse died with them and was not transmitted to future generations.” Angered his views on sterilisation had been aborted the leader argued the “feeble-minded” should be segregated from the opposite sex.

Defending his case Churchill said sterilising would come as a much cheaper cost opposed to sending the “feeble minded” to colonies and surgery would allow them “to live freely in the world without causing much inconvenience to others.”

 

It tickles my brain in a strange way that the Americans did such a pissweak job of de-nazification after WWII (deliberately so in many ways) and it worked out great for the empire.

But after toppling Saddam, they did a much better job of removing every member of the Ba’ath party from civilian and military power, and it turned into a disaster.

I’ve been turning it over it my head, what was incompetence, what was deliberate, how these two distinct yet similar events played out. Was it simply a matter of the management of empire becoming less competent over time? Would full denazification have caused similar issues in postwar Germany (the experience of the GDR suggests not)?

Very interesting to think about.

0
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by glimmer_twin@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net
 

Can’t believe I slept on it thinking it was gonna be some run of the mill “people go to a place and get slowly killed off” type thriller. Highly recommend if you’ve also let it pass by like I have.

It’s also very funny.

 

Love my non-political fantasy series that heavily features racism, colonialism, the consequences those things have for the colonised, and their armed resistance to colonisation.

 
[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

17 screenshots of text and never answers or even considers the key question. We all know why China pivoted toward capitalist development, the question is when or if it will ever pivot back.

2nd screenshot:

you can only…. If you already have developed industry

China has a well developed industrial economy. It’s been developing for half a century and has no sign of stopping. How developed does it need to be before you stop doing capitalism? How long will it take?

The first four screens aren’t exactly new information. It’s the justification used by the USSR in enacting the NEP. Y’know, the NEP that lasted less than a decade? China is well into the 4th decade of marketisation and there are no indications that it’s likely to change anytime soon - private ownership and inequality are expanding in China, not contracting.

The second half of the post, sure, I don’t think China is imperialist either (yet?). But the first half of the post is just a lot of words for “we’re building productive forces bro trust us bro we’re doing communism any second now bro” which is an argument we’ve all heard a thousand times.

 

Just saw it. Eh.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Imagine tweeting “i I have no empathy” and taking 46 words to do it

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

I really wish this game was better. Got very repetitive and shallow very quickly and the RPG elements weren’t amazing. I really like that they went so openly anti-capitalist, even that’s presented in a pretty low-hanging-fruit “every single capitalist operator is extremely blatantly evil” kind of a way

 

Like.... what the fuck? Danny Boyle has been known to make good films. You’re working with the catalogue of the Beatles, they have some, I dunno, pretty good songs. But what resulted is an absolutely jarring mess of shitty covers, bad acting, bad direction, weird editing, weird dialogue.... I honestly feel like I did a bunch of drugs before watching this movie, and not in a fun way. I haven’t felt this bemused and upset by a film since I did a bunch of ketamine watching Fear and Loathing and thought I was watching the movie from inside the TV.

This is a movie about Beatles music that has more screen time for Ed sheeran and his music than the fucking Beatles. They even manage to shoehorn in the despicable black hole of talent that is James Cordern. The whole time I was expecting a cameo from a living beatle (because if anyone can get a beatle, it would be the director who did the opening of the Olympic Games after all), and at one point they tease it but don’t do it! Instead they perform a travesty by having some dude that, admittedly, looks a lot like an old John Lennon, show up. In this dogshit movie. The surviving Beatles probably didn’t want to attach their names to this absolute turd.

I’m not even a huge Beatles fan. I think they have a bunch of good songs but are somewhat overrated. And even I feel like this does a disservice to their music, and it’s just on the whole a terrible movie. There’s so many Dutch angles I started to think the cinematographer had an inner ear disorder.

Has anyone else seen this? Am I completely off kilter? I thought this movie was dog shit from the first 90 seconds, how does this exist?!

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Most self-identified leftists have critiques of the late USSR and the revisionist CPSU as well though, I think that’s more compatible with our worldview than stating things like “the Chinese revolution hadn’t actually done anything to change the old structures of power in China” :agony-turbo:

 

My lingering feeling that he sucks/is an op is growing. I’ve long figured that nobody truly subversive would be getting published by the BBC. The majority of his latest work is a borderline anti communist hit piece tbh.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

Honestly impressive when artists can do that. I saw the cure three or four years ago, Robert Smith sounds exactly like he did in the 80s. Meanwhile I saw Oasis like fifteen years ago and Liam Gallagher already sounded like shit lol

view more: next ›