gomp

The app at my gym sucks: there is no checklist of what exercises you have done and no tracking of how much weight you used. Plus, for whatever reason, it wants access to my location.

I've found a number of alternatives on F-Droid, but each of the six or so I tried was completely unusable (some seemed unfinished alphas, others are probably too old for my android version).

Is there one app that you use and would recommend?

What I'm looking for is:

• At home: I setup my programs (different ones for different days)
• At the gym: I can select a program, check off the exercises while I do them (the order I do them on depends on where there is fewer people at the gym), and log things like if I managed all the sets/reps, how much weight I used, and how long I exercised for (for things like the tapis roulant).
• Bonus points if I can also track my weight in the same app, and if the app can export/sync the data or produce some kind of graphs/statistics based on it.

Thanks!

This may be OT since strictly speaking it's about hardware... I trust it is ok to post it given the spirit of the community, but have my apologies and feel free to remove it if it's not.

I'm looking to replace my old Bose QC25, since they have recently died (after a long a fulfilling life), but it seems everything nowadays is bluetooth (which I don't mind) and require some proprietary app to turn ANC on/off (which I do mind... are physical buttons/switches become too expensive to include in your overpriced earbuds?).

Anyway... do you know of any headphones/earbuds that meet the following?

1. can be powered via wire or have batteries that last 12+hrs (long-haul flights)
2. have decent noise cancelling
3. don't require me to install a apps or can be used with some open source app (possibly with full functionality and straightforward to setup)
4. are not overly expensive (I have to buy 2 pairs and I'll only use them a few times a year when I fly)

I want to call the escapeSystemdPath (defined in nixpgs at nixos/lib/utils.nix) to derive the name of a systemd mount unit from the target path (eg. srv-my-dir.mount from /srv/my/dir), but I can't figure out how I can reference it... any ideas?

I'm playing around with nixos in a few VMs and at some point I realized I must have lost the swap configuration in one of my refactorings.

To my surprise, however, the VMs do use the swap partitions I had set up.

There is no mention on "swap" in my nix configuration (or in fstab) and no .swap units in /etc/systemd/system; I do however have a swap partition labelled "swap".

Turns out there is a systemd unit (albeit not a corresponding file) that sets up swap:

[root@vm1:~]# free -hw
               total        used        free      shared     buffers       cache   available
Mem:           2.8Gi       664Mi       955Mi       4.0Mi       3.0Mi       1.3Gi       2.0Gi
Swap:          3.7Gi          0B       3.7Gi

[root@vm1:~]# systemctl list-dependencies swap.target 
swap.target
● └─dev-disk-by\x2ddiskseq-1\x2dpart3.swap

I'm wondering where the unit comes from? Can I rely on this and never configure swap ever again?

Is there an extension that warns you when you are wasting time reading ai-generated crap?

Case in point, I was reading an article that claimed to compare kubernetes distros and wasted some good minutes before realizing it was full of crap.

I have an option that must be left with the default value when a certain flag (another option) is false.

I didn't find any example (let alone documentation) on how to implement this, so I've come up with two ideas:

option-that-errors-out-if-set-when-flag-is-false =
let
  default = if config.some-flag
          then "some default value for when flag is true"
          else "value that should not be changed when flag is false";
in lib.mkOption {
  type = lib.types.str;
  inherit default;
  apply = v: assert assertMsg (config.some-flag || v == default) "Do not set this option unless 'flag' is true";
          v;
};

option-that-ignores-value-when-flag-is-false =
let
  default = if config.some-flag
          then "some default value for when flag is true"
          else "value that should not be changed when flag is false";
in lib.mkOption {
  type = lib.types.str;
  inherit default;
  apply = v: if config.some-flag then v else default;
};

Which one do you think is "best" (cleaner, more idiomatic, etc..)?

Is apply the "right" place to validate options? Should I make a custom type instead? Should I approach this in some different way?

I'd like to set a "global" option from within a submodule, but the config I return is grafted into the "global" under the submodule "path" rather than at the root... any idea if it's somehow possible?

Er... I guess I didn't make a great job at explaining what I want to do... Some code will hopefully help.

In mymodule.nix I have:

{ lib, config, ... }: {

  options.myoption = lib.mkOption {
      type = lib.types.attrsOf (lib.types.submodule (
        import ./mysubmodule.nix
      ));
  };

}

and mysubmodule.nix is:

{ name, lib, config, ... }: {

options.mysubmoduleoption = {
  type = lib.types.str;
};

config = {
  # here I want to set a "global" option, say "systemd.mounts"
  # based on the value of "mymodule.name.mysubmoduleoption"
  # but it seems I can only set values under "mymodule.name" 
};

}

I'm trying to debug a module I'm writing with builtins.trace, but it's being more complicated than I anticipated.

Let's say I have a module:

{ config, lib, pkgs, modulesPath, ... }:

{

  config =
  let
    some-list = lib.attrsets.mapAttrsToList (n: v: {
        some-attr = "${n} ${v}";
    }) { n1 = "v1"; n2 = "v2"; };
  in {
    users.mutableUsers = builtins.trace (some-list) false;
  };

}

This will print

trace: [ <code> <code> ]

because builtins.trace (for whatever reason?) evaluates its first argument only shallowly.

Changing the trace expression to:

builtins.trace (builtins.toJSON some-list) false;

helps a lot, but as soon as one tries to print a long list or a structure with some complexity the output is completely unreadable, and it's not like it can easily be piped into jq (I mean... &| grep ^trace: | sed 's/trace: //' | jq works*, but there must be a "better" way?)

(*) in fish shell, IDK about bash

edit: It's not like I specifically want JSON output: any format will do (ideally, nix would be nice)

I need to generate a number of scripts in my configuration and make them into a single package (for ease of reference, because there are a lot of them).

So far, I'm creating the scripts via writeShellApplication, making them into packages via an overlay, merging them with buildEnv and then adding the resulting package to `systemPackages.

Something like:

nixpkgs.overlays = [ (final: prev: {
  my-hello-1 = final.writeShellApplication {
    name = "my-hello-1-script";
    text = "echo my hello wolrd 1";
  };
  my-hello-2 = final.writeShellApplication {
    name = "my-hello-2-script";
    text = "echo my hello wolrd 1";
  };
  my-hello-scripts = final.buildEnv {
    name = "my-hello-scripts";
    paths = [ final.my-hello-1 final.my-hello-2 ];
  };
}) ];

environment.systemPackages = [ pkgs.my-hello-scripts ];

This works, but I don't really need the my-hello-1 and my-hello-2 packages... can you think of a way to make do without needing them?

I'm migrating my NAS to nixos, and I got to the point of setting up my restic backups.

services.restic.backups is great, but -- on top of the systemd timers/services -- I also want some helper scripts (eg. one to easily mount the backups, stuff that with ansible I currently generate into /usr/local/sbin).

These scripts would be entirely generated from the services.restic.backups config and would reference sops secrets also from configuration.nix, so... I don't think it would make sense to make a package out of them?

What should I use to make these scripts? Should I use nixpkgs.writeShellApplication and then alter the PATH?

Since I need to run a few apps that won't work on LineageOS (because dumb developer security stance), I need to buy a "regular" android device that includes all the google "services".

Ideally, it should be a cheap second-hand phone that will still receive security updates for a long time.

Are there bands that are better (well, "less worse") than others from a privacy perspective?