hamsterkill

This is the point of collective bargaining contracts. A union negotiates the rules by which their members and companies interact, sign a contract, and then both are bound by that contract for the term.

The union is claiming the contract they have in place prevents the automation of voice by the bound company unless they get agreement from the union first.

Thurott's article on this implies that "big customers like DDG will be unaffected". Though he also says information is scarce.

Contributions will still need to be made outside of GitHub.

Contributions will still go through phabricator rather than GitHub. GitHub does still give their greater visibility than elsewhere, though.

They aren't using GitHub for issues, pull requests, or (that i'm aware of) pipelines.

Bugzilla is still where they are managing bug reports and contributions will still go through (I think) phabricator. Note the lack of Issues and Pull Request tabs on the GitHub repo. This is more just a change of hosting than anything.

My interpretation of your request boils down to "what's a good co-op roguelike" where the grinding is the replaying.

So, depending on how many players you need it to support and preferred genres, you might check out games like

• Risk of Rain 2
• Enter the Gungeon
• Children of Morta
• Vampire Survivors
• Streets of Rogue
• Gunfire Reborn
• Barony

There's also a game called Jumpship that i'm keeping an eye on the development of that's supposed to be hitting early access in the coming months.

I think Teams has already taken over there as well.

I expect the trusted authorities would be selected by the server where the user account resides. I.e. if a server's admin does not recognize a certain authority, it would not show their verifications to users logged in to their server.

It's possible that it could extend to user selections of trusted verifiers as well, but I think implementing that level of granularity would be more of pain than it's worth to Bluesky. Still, I could be surprised.

Revolt relies on community self hosting last I looked at it, which means it would never be a "mass" solution.

Should Discord ever collapse (something I don't see in the near future), the free alternatives that I see benefitting would be XMPP and Matrix — though there's new contenders that could make name for themselves by then too.

I think their plan is for it to be like how website cert verification works. You have a set of trusted authorities that issue certs (or in this case verifications) and that can revoke them if needed.

Isn't owning the domain proof enough already?

It's open to abuse and exploitation the same way domains are in general. An enterprising faker could register a domain that looks legit, but isn't.