I don't get it.
henfredemars
It saves no energy. In fact, it costs more energy at first, but the hope is that bots will turn their attention to something that isn't so expensive as hitting your servers. The main goal is to get your service online so that you're not burning all your own resources on fake users.
Your understanding is consistent with mine. It spends a small amount of effort (per user) that makes scaling too expensive (per bot-farm-entity). It also uses an adjustable difficulty that can vary depending on how sus a request appears to be.
It's not a perfect solution by any means. It doesn't protect user data. It doesn't do anything to help with the energy problem. It merely makes it possible for someone to run their server without getting taken offline by automated systems.
You can’t play those games when your CPU burns out for defective manufacturing.
It works by asking your system for a small computation before handling the request. It’s not too intrusive for normal users, but it drives up the costs for bot farms.
His constituents seem to like the way he fucks them over.
This is a bad idea. It enables the shutdown to keep running.
Oooh good point. The problem might just go away on its own anyway. It would’ve sucked to have not bought that yacht in the meantime.
That’s always a risk, but I’m doubtful that our plutocrats would like to lose all of their riches in a nuclear war.
I see it more becoming like modern day Russia.
I’m doubting that the US can meaningfully compete in its current state.
Yes, could be AI. Would like a source ideally before sharing possible slop with otheres.