henfredemars

joined 2 years ago
[–] henfredemars 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nonsense! 💰🖨️🔜

[–] henfredemars 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I swear the little shits do it just because they can.

[–] henfredemars 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dwarf Fortress. Yes, my 1st axe has a newborn. And yes she’s going to take it with her into the field of battle.

[–] henfredemars 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We had an intern do this once. We changed our server config to make sure it wouldn’t accept such operations.

[–] henfredemars 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm sure investors are loving this.

[–] henfredemars 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'll reserve my enthusiasm for when the next JavaScript framework actually takes off. Then, I'll be more than happy for it.

[–] henfredemars 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Perhaps, but with his advanced dementia I wonder if he might get the Democrats and Republicans confused.

[–] henfredemars 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I did! But it wasn't because of good planning. It was because of autism and the inability to delete anything.

[–] henfredemars 27 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

Will he actually comply with the ruling?

[–] henfredemars 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Hard disagree. Corporatism is distinctly on the fascist side of the house, and it distinctly has an in-group and an out-group at its very basic ideological level whereas communism in principle seeks to eliminate classes.

Now, you might have classes in practice, sure, but explicit racism/ethnostate situations is definitely not a defining feature of communism. I would agree if you said this sign describes authoritarian regimes! But, I think that communism has a distinct meaning that is separate from being authoritarian whereas fascism is inherently authoritarian (in group oppresses everyone else). This seems to be conflating something to say that it's communism as well.

[–] henfredemars 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don’t think it would be a good conversion. There would have to be some compromises. For example, does Dolby even have a concept of audio below the listener? That’s not truly 3-D like the new standard aims to be. I think some variants might have something like that.

I imagine that you’ll be able to convert to some extent, but of course capabilities for which there’s no direct mapping won’t translate perfectly. If there’s demand for that and the standard actually catches on, I’m sure there could be some sort of conversion.

[–] henfredemars 3 points 3 weeks ago

Hey look, still not a drag queen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›