intelati

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
walmart
sorted by: new top controversial old
The Batshit Crazy Story Of The Day Elon Musk Decided To Personally Rip Servers Out Of A Sacramento Data Center in c/technology@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

SpaceX is now old space. They are the launch capacity of the USA. It's ridiculous actually

TIL: Chuck norris’s first name is actually carlos in c/todayilearned@chat.maiion.com
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I had to check the community name. I was partially convinced it was a "chuck Norris fact"

Low dose aspirin increases brain bleeding risk but does not decrease stroke risk in c/science@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I remember something about this year(s) ago? As long as you're healthy with no family history aspirin just increases risk?

I suddenly don’t want cake… in c/shittyfoodporn@lemmy.ca
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean sure. Initially it looks horrid. But think about it. It's just a hardboiled egg.. there's worse things it could be

US says Wagner coup is ‘real’ and ‘serious’ as White House consults allies in c/world@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the ideal outcome for Ukraine and the "West"

Jerboa appreciation in c/jerboa@lemmy.ml
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's a pretty good alternative. A bit "janky" but it's a alpha app.

Lemmy's total users continues to surge to over 1.1 million, up from 740k yesterday! in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Exactly what a bot would say

Ukraine is winning — and it is changing in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ukraine has basically handed the second "strongest" military aa stalemate. Which is a win IMO. Throw the might off the military industrial complex at the problem and banish the military for the foreseeable future.

system of a rule in c/196@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

-1 comments. Huh. Never seen that before.

Are there any Reddit refugees spending more time on Lemmy than Reddit? in c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'm sitting at like 95% Lemmy/3% Reddit is fun/2% oops I opened a tab of Reddit by default

I need to clear the history

Who even uses Celsius in c/memes@sopuli.xyz
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I mean technically they are related by F=(9/5) * C+32.

So they're related, just linearly.

Black kitty enjoying the sun in c/cat@lemmy.world
[–] intelati@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Void's are always so pretty

13
XKCD: Heat Pump (lemmy.world)
 

https://xkcd.com/2790

9
Heat Pump: 2790 (xkcd.com)
1
Memes are welcome too? (lemmy.world)
 

https://www.reddit.com/r/walmart/comments/14a2obq/mmmhmm_yep

1
Why Walmart's new bet on fashion brands, home decor threatens specialty chains (www.reuters.com)
 

Trying out a mix of types of posts here. Give me feedback.

1
Good Morning Walmart (lemmy.world)
 
22
When the Definitions are longer than the text, you need a better bill (United States of America House Resolution 1615) (www.congress.gov)
 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Gas Stove Protection and Freedom Act”.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) COMMISSION.—The term “Commission” means the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

(2) GAS STOVE.—The term “gas stove” means any gas range, gas stove, or household cooking gas appliance that meets the standard set forth in American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z21.1/ CSA Z21.1 or any successor standard.

(3) SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE AVERAGE PRICE OF GAS STOVES.—The term “substantially increase the average price of gas stoves” means that the average price of a gas stove, annualized over its expected life, would likely be substantially higher than the average spending by United States homeowners on cooking stoves and ovens based on the most recent data for consumer expenditures reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON CPSC BANNING GAS STOVES.

No Federal funds may be used by the Commission to regulate a gas stove as a banned hazardous product under section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2057) or to impose or enforce any consumer product safety standard or rule on gas stoves under section 7 or 9 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2056 or 2058) that would otherwise result in a prohibition on the use or sale of gas stoves in the United States or would otherwise substantially increase the average price of gas stoves in the United States.

view more: next ›