jeff11

joined 2 years ago
[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago

I cared less about this story and more about the attention that it generated. New Zealand has an extremely feminine culture, we care too much about people and what they do, what they look like, or how they are coping emotionally. The story only serves as a distraction from numerous failures which Parliament is responsible for, and seeks to humanise a group of people (Members of Parliament) that are largely predatory and corrupt.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz -1 points 2 years ago

It fails to upload as a comment and I'm not going to resize every single file (assuming that's the issue). Sorry if you're on mobile and don't have a real computer.

 

Open the URL, I self-hosted a zip file with 9 photos so you don't have to visit a website that's filled with ads.

http://rentingcrisis.nz/forum/images/chalk/activism.zip

I wrote in 20 locations around riccarton and ilam. Most of my chalk was on riccarton road or perhaps 50 metres into a side street.

Please share this file.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There won't be any significant change, and they will become bigger spenders than Labour when it comes to prisons. Supposedly the prison system is at maximum capacity and it's just not popular to build more prisons (even though we should). I'd be in favour of National if their policy included building something like the Black Dolphin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Dolphin_Prison) but then having normal prisons for people who commit minor offenses, like swearing on the phone or not paying their parking fines.

As far as I'm concerned Luxon is just a twink who takes it up the can. He's not the far-right over-zealous Christian bigot that Reddit says he is. He's not going to make any significant changes - and his policies will cost the tax payer more. How many prisons will they need to build to keep people locked up? This is the question that nobody is asking. What is the cost to the tax payer? And what will they do as an incentive to not ram raid, not join gangs and not commit crime? The minimum wage isn't enough to live on. If I suddenly have to buy a new car I'll have to ask my folks for some money. National and Labour are crap parties and I don't understand why anyone votes for them, they have destroyed the economy, made everything unaffordable.

If you don't go to uni at 17, get a degree by age 20, get into middle management in your 20s, then you'll just never own a new Mazda or a house. Even if you do everything perfectly, at best you can own a small townhouse and have 2 children by the time you're 40. The quality of life keeps going down, even for the upper middle class. We stress out and work hard just for basics. This country is a hellhole.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

making it harder for young families to buy in the communities they live and work in

Yay let's all spend $100 a week commuting to work and back.

Looking forward to dying from heatstroke in 50 years time from global warming due to increased and prolonged reliance on fossil fuels.

National will do everything they can to sabotage cheap petrol. The Marsden Point Refinery will never function again, and National supports the Russia Sanctions Act, making sure we never buy petrol from the #2 producer in the world, meanwhile #1 producer (Saudi Arabia) increases the price. India and China will continue using diesel and oil as usual and here in NZ the yuppie elite will drive their Teslas, and using fossil fuels will be a dirty poor people thing. It'll mostly be poor people like me who can't buy a new $15,000 EV with 70 battery health who will be driving petrol cars 5 years from now.

I'll be demonised for my carbon sins.

Luxon says climate change is a fact and it's caused by us, so it's only a matter of time before a fanatical nutjob proposes a ban on natural gas. There is nobody advocating for continued use of fossil fuel, they all want it gone, just a matter of how long.

China will continue to use the Power Of Siberia pipeline and use quantities of gas that we cannot imagine, but kiwis will be told that having a bbq is bad, and driving an LPG forklift is bad. In Christchurch we had very strong winds yesterday and within a few hours of the government alert system pinging our phones, Redditors were speculating that the Nor West wind is proof of climate change.

If people can afford the latest technologies that's great, but I'm poor and I want to continue using fossil fuels especially when my rent is so high. What if it's the weekend and 1 of the other 11 tenants is using the only washing machine and dryer? How do I wash my laundry if I don't have a petrol car to drive to the laundromat? I can't believe the greenies are going on about housing trusts and not taking about ridiculous zoning and regulations that prevent us from having a world class city. I can't cook where I live, I can't do my laundry. The washing machine is constantly breaking and playing up. It'll just lock a person's clothes and not open for 3 days. It's a disaster. So until I have my own apartment with a bike shed and laundry, I'm probably going to need fossil fuels.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago

I'm going to study the language only when I have reliable income to travel, otherwise I learn language, only to forget it, then pay thousands of dollars for more language lessons. Foreigners don't need fluency in Russian language to teach English in a high school, just need to be good enough. I'm not sure how to define fluency, but obviously it's impossible to pass certification if I don't know any grammar, for example.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What's the minimum age to get into Parliament, and how many candidates are under 35 years old? Born in, let's say, 1987 or after? I'll consider voting again but only if there are more candidates under 35.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd have preferred it if they'd just done nothing to be honest. By "doing something" but still changing nothing, it just gives them an excuse to nag for votes again, which they don't deserve.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Nearly all of these things are just tweaks that can be achieved by signing some documents. The country has gone backwards under Labour and it will go backwards under National too. I'm going to wait for boomers to die off before I consider voting in another election. There's no point in voting for parties that will protect landlords and stamp out legislation that will allow for new builds. Which is all of them.

Banned military style semi automatics

They did this to protect themselves not to protect us.

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 years ago

I support them destroying themselves. If their core voters abandon them, that will teach them a lesson. Two years of failure and we're supposed to what... respect them?

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Labour shouldn't have run a campaign. They should have let the Green Party take their place. Having Labour run again is just embarrassing.

 

This is the best thing for Christchurch. It should've happened 15 years ago.

 

The other day I met a guy from Chengdu, so I looked it up on YouTube. I also follow a modest YouTuber who uploads videos of Saint Petersburg when he goes for walks with his wife and granddaughter.

I'm not suggesting that Christchurch should look like one of these big cities with 10 or 20 million people, but could we please knock down that derelict building that's next to the bus exchange? It has walls falling down, and graffiti everywhere. Then there's the case of shipping containers on the side of the road.

These inner-city features give third world vibes. I don't care what these buildings are, please destroy them.

We also need a city-wide land tax to encourage development. There are empty sections all around Christchurch that aren't being used for anything (or they are just for parking a jetboat). I saw two properties in Sumner that are used for parking a jet boat, and there are places in Riccarton like Kirkwood Ave and Leslie Street, each have an empty section which has been empty for 20+ years. The central and local governments aren't doing anything to solve these problems.

 

Am I just dumb or does this happen for other people?

 

Back in 1935 the first Labour government came to power and faced a severe housing crisis. It didn’t fiddle and tinker – it rolled its sleeves up. By the late 1930s it was building 3500 state houses per year for a population of around 1.5 million.

 

When

Monday, the 28th of August, 6pm onward

Where

Christchurch WEA, 59 Gloucester Street (near the Art Gallery)

https://www.cwea.org.nz/

What to expect

Since this is 3 weeks away I haven't confirmed any speakers yet.

If the meeting receives enough interest, then it will grow. There are other groups such as Save Passenger Rail and a Living Wage group, the overlapping interests can help to boost this new group.

 

Hey everyone, I registered a domain name and installed phpBB forum software, but I will also be:

  • hosting meetings at Spagalimi's Pizzeria in Christchurch
  • hosting meetings at the WEA (59 Gloucester)
  • advertising through the Christchurch Progressive Network mail list
  • knocking on doors to promote the forum
  • setting up a table and chairs in town for some real life promo

The website is www.rentingcrisis.nz and that's where I'll be organising events in the near future.

I had some trouble with password resets on Lemmy so I just created a new account. I want to reply to https://lemmy.nz/u/kiwikruizer regarding this thread: https://lemmy.nz/post/26847

I complained about the crowded boarding house where I live and kiwikruizer replied: "Theres a few places around that have ensuites in the ~$230 range". This isn't the response that I expected. I pay slightly more than $230 a week (going up to $300 a week soon) and the problem isn't the lack of an ensuite bathroom. I didn't understand where kiwikruizer was coming from, because I never mentioned anything about an ensuite, I just said the place was crowded.

To clarify, a boarding house is not a house where you have 6 or 8 bedrooms and only 2 communal bathrooms. A boarding house will, in nearly all cases, be a modern building with 6 or 8 bedrooms that all have ensuites, but which share a kitchen (and optionally, a lounge, but it isn't required). I think most rentals are under a boarding house contract these days, unless for some reason it's a fixed contract (which I would recommend avoiding unless a person is well-off)

This confusion of terms is another reason why I want to host public meetings. People don't understand renting and have misconceptions about how it works, what it costs, and how convenient it is.

The $230 a week boarding houses that kiwikruizer mention generally have very thin walls and doors, so you can hear people coughing from down the hall, or singing in their bathroom in the morning. The median rent price is much higher than $230 a week, and even these $230 a week properties are more likely $245 or $250 by now. The prices will keep going up and up until we do something about it.

I'll keep you all updated on my progress. It will be a difficult road to build an active group but I'm determined to do this, because the alternative is doing nothing and having nothing change.

view more: next ›