it breaks the social contract of tolerance and seeks to end discourse by killing the participants when escalated to its final form. hate groups are no more participants in discourse than fire is an architectural style for building a house.
we don't have to take seriously the folks that suggest "let's set it on fire" when discussing whether we want to build a victorian or modern style home because they are not serious people and their poor ideas have been proven idiotic too many times to count.
he's referring to the fact that almost all browsers use chrome's rendering engine and google is abusing its position of leadership by making unnecessary api changes that make adblocking extensions all but impossible to implement.
if you want to still be able to block ads on the web in the years to come, switch to a non-chrome web browser to limit google's power and ability to abuse its position.
i think as of now, they have delayed the sabotage, but it's coming.
yeah, it seems like if lemmy implemented "only subscribers can post" and "mods must approve subscriptions" features for communities, beehaw's concerns about trolling could be solved.
it might take a while for that, though - i think lemmy devs are still working through community features, like private communities and such. amazing progress they've made, but advanced community features would be such a solid win for them, esp right now.
i'm also joining the first comment train, choo choo!
how many years of lost productivity and set backs in open web standards because of their internet explorer nonsense and you're saying it wasn't a successful execution of this strategy? i think they won and set back the open web by years.
one point about the mit license is that it's not copyleft because mit license does not protect derivative works. that is why they fought so hard against gpl licensed works and even forbade the gpl3 license on codeplex. mit license is no threat because it can be incorporated into closed source products.
with github, i don't think they are going to pull a musk or a spez, they are going to wield their influence carefully to frame the conversation and tools around open software to work in their favor as they have always tried to do. i do agree that they seem less outwardly aggressive than back in the day, though.
as far as facebook in the fediverse, they will have the ability to inflict significant, if not fatal, damage, just like ms did to open web with ie and just like google did with xmpp with gchat. that's something worth discussing.