jungekatz

joined 2 years ago
[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 2 points 2 years ago
[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 0 points 2 years ago

Me who learnt from porn :3

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 1 points 2 years ago

The law also keeps it vague enough , that it says employed individual , so they could be waiting tables and this will still apply !!

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 5 points 2 years ago

They prepared a list of software that need mandatory audit , like browsers and all !

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Coz what ? GDPR? If they have good intentions they need to see the web integrity api !

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 2 points 2 years ago

Basically A foss product is not exempted if an employee ( does not need to be a tech employee) contributes to a foss prod , or if a company donates to them ! So even npm packages by individual coders who are employed say.by dominos need to take audit and deliver vulnerability free code .

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 4 points 2 years ago

Just read the act then ! It keeps it vague enough to consider a person working in free time will be considered a commercial product

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Please watch the video above !

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well if i am developing a product and I work for a corp or if my project is getting donation from a corp , it will be considered as a commerical project , it does not need me to be working on that product as part of my work !!

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 1 points 2 years ago

Not really most apps I have on my phone are now fdroid apps !

[–] jungekatz@lib.lgbt 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They consider foss products out of this requirement , only when the contributors are volunteers who are not working or are employed by a company !! Or get a corporate donation, if even one person contributing to the project is a corporate employee they need to go with the crazy rules they have laid !!

view more: ‹ prev next ›