keegomatic

joined 2 years ago
[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Nothing is black and white. Bernie may be a geezer, but he has consistently good policy positions for his entire career, and has more integrity than the rest of the senate combined.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No, it’s obvious to anyone with a brain. If the commenter seriously thought it might have been a false positive when they read the original comment, they never would have relayed their thought the way they did in their reply, and it is so clearly a reference to the content of the post that to analyze it even that deeply is overkill. To anyone reading this who is a native English speaker: if you think that comment needs a “/s”, you need to work on your reading comprehension. Read things more carefully.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a lot of heated debate about this. They're saying due to COVID, that "early" can mean anything from 0-8 now

I would love to hear the logic behind that

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I’ve never thought about how the “hand” looks a lot more like the raptor’s foot than its hand, but now it’s hard not to see it

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I suspect a lot of people don’t use avatars because they aren’t even visible on the app they use to access Lemmy. I don’t think Voyager has them on by default. Maybe I just turned them off a long time ago. Regardless, I don’t think a lack of avatar signals what you think it signals.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Since always, without a subpoena. Until PRISM, at least.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It should be called The Endarkenment, just saying

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It’s not a combination of the names, it’s wordplay: “splayd” => “splay” (like splayed tines, to cover “fork”) + “spade” (a shovel, sharper than a spoon, which covers “knife” and “spoon”)

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That’s not the issue I was replying to at all.

replace jobs wholesale with no oversight or understanding that need a human to curate the output

Yeah, that sucks, and it’s pretty stupid, too, because LLMs are not good replacements for humans in most respects.

we

Don’t “other” me just because I’m correcting misinformation. I’m not a fan of corporate bullshit either. Misinformation is misinformation, though. If you have a strong opinion about something, then you should know what you’re talking about. LLMs are a nuanced subject, and they are here to stay, for better or worse.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep, you’re exactly right. That’s a great way to express it.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Tenty years ago

Actually, after “ninety” comes “one hundred”

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

This is an increasingly bad take. If you work in an industry where LLMs are becoming very useful, you would realize that hallucinations are a minor inconvenience at best for the applications they are well suited for, and the tools are getting better by leaps and bounds, week by week.

edit: Like it or not, it’s true. I use LLMs at work, most of my colleagues do too, and none of us use the output raw. Hallucinations are not an issue when you are actively collaborating with the model and not using it to either “know things for you” or “do the work for you.” Neither of those things are what LLMs are really good at, but that’s what most laypeople use them for, so these criticisms are very obviously short-sighted to those of us who have real-world experience with them in a domain where they work well.

view more: next ›