khorovodoved

The plot of instance admins to hide the fact that they were asked to post that would be a conspiracy. Yes, it would be reasonable for devs to ask them that. And it would be reasonable for admins to mention that in their posts.

Also, lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works is not "all over lemmy". They have full support on .ml and hexbear and significant support on .ee.

They only made one post in .ml (I would assume ml users are fine with their policies). Everything else are reposts done by third parties.

Well, if the instance owner has a political narrative he would push it. Because he believes that it is a good thing. Test instance or not.

The only option I see is that someone else would offer them his instance (which has to be rather popular) for test purposes. But that would not do anything to .ml because then they would just pay for .ml from their pocket (which against comes from development funding).

And denying lemmy development funding would do nothing to .ml because .ml running costs are too small. So it would just continue to work on the latest version with developers hotfixing things only for their instance as they break.

Why would anyone apoint a moderator he does not agree with?

They need an instance for test purposes or no development would be done. And they would run such instance as they see fit.

Agree, but breaking the law and putting your whole operation at risk is not a clever nor productive way to fight it.

I agree that the laws are bad. However, they are still laws. Breaking them has consequences.

If the library does not have the license or a right, guaranteed by law, to do that, then it is piracy.