lasersharkshark

joined 5 months ago

No problem! These things are always presented to the general public as being innocuous When they clearly are not. When we are bombarded with that perspective it's hard to approach it any other way.

[–] lasersharkshark@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For one it normalised the dystopian behavior. The comment above proves my point.

Secondly, employees go places there are no security cameras, like bathrooms.

Thirdly, it encourages other employers to follow suit.

Fourthly, why? What is it being used for? You can bet it's going to be a way to monitor employees.

Fifth, cameras aren't free so by being okay with this means you are okay with Loblaws raising prices so they can pay for these cameras.

[–] lasersharkshark@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The theme of the top comment is don't be defeatist and you come in and reply with a defeatist comment. Your own comment history mentions having a Costco membership to buy laundry detergent. If you're buying from Costco you are buying in bulk so who is your comment even for?

That's all before we get to the disabled with family of 5 part you glanced over. Sure lots of people may not own their homes but most of them are not disabled supporting a good sized family either.

[–] lasersharkshark@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Google co-founder announces staff are underpaid by 50%

[–] lasersharkshark@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

So the lesson is that if you don't want your hands bitten off don't attack a shark.