This looks like old news to me. Years ago I've read that three letter agencies can access phones without getting the access code or bio-metrics from the phone owner.
I picked the lesser evil
The choice for iOS can be a convenient choice for daily use if one is ready to deal with the restrictions (Like every other web browser is a Safari browser layer instead of a real browser and the fact that Apple is not into allowing ad-blocking easily). With Android phones the freedom for the end user is, compared to iOS, massive. And having a de-Googled Android phone with a custom ROM is no longer rocket-science or for the faint of heart these days because you can buy custom ROM Android phones pre-installed so you're good to go.
And we’re cheering it on because X is seen as a political opponent.
I'm cheering this on among others because the shadow-banned person wrote something important about a sick EU law proposal that tried to break E2EE.
Strongly agree but lots keep using X, in fact it seems to get worse :(
Here's a take by a Mozilla employee :
I did lots of reading about this and am still wondering why someone would want to opt for catch-all domains over aliases. Catch-alls seem highly susceptible to spam and while I haven’t actually done any email aliasing yet,
I'm using catch-all since years and no spammer has ever made up a new email alias to spam me.
it doesn’t seem to take much effort to make a new alias if you have a plan with unlimited aliases.
That depends. The moment you are in a shop without your phone/email and they really want an email address you can simply write down their_company_name@your_email_domain_name for them without having to compromise anything.
It will remain only on the LAN without being reachable from the internet, does the “not https” aka “personal certificate” will be a problem?
Caddy can do local SSL certificates without needing browser exceptions.
Nice