The particular AI model this article is talking about is actually openly published for anyone to freely use or modify (fine-tune). There is a barrier in that it requires several hundred gigs of RAM to run, but it is public.
lily33
joined 2 years ago
Now, if only the article explained how that killing was related to TikTok. The only relevant thing I saw was,
had its roots in a confrontation on social media.
It's says "social media", not "TokTok" though.
Why are you surprised? They are called cock-roaches, after all...
Why is this downvoted? If it's true it's a valid criticism, and if it's false, I couldn't find a mention of anonymity either.
Wary reader, learn from my cautionary tale
I'm not sure what to learn exactly. I don't get what went wrong or why, just that the files hit deleted somehow...
Yes, almost like they have intentionally waited until Trump's election.
And they're all with different commit message:
"switched arse to bottom to create a more uplifting vibe"
"took arse out and put bottom in to keep my language warm and friendly"
"thought bottom would sound a lot nicer than arse, so I used it"
And so on..
We did have problems with vaccines before Trump
Type in "Is Kamala Harris a good Democratic candidate
...and any good search engine will find results containing keywords such as "Kamala Harris", "Democratic", "candidate", and "good".
[...] you might ask if she's a "bad" Democratic candidate instead
In that case, of course the search engine will find results containing keywords such as "Kamala Harris", "Democratic", "candidate", and "bad".
So the whole premise that, "Fundamentally, that's an identical question" is just bullshit when it comes to searching. Obviously, when you put in the keyword "good", you'll find articles containing "good", and if you put in the keyword "bad", you'll find articles containing "bad" instead.
Google will find things that match the keywords that you put in. So does DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Yahoo, whatever. That is what a good search engine is supposed to do.
I can assure you, when search engines stop doing that, and instead try to give "balanced" results, according to whatever opaque criteria for "balanced" their company comes up with, that will be the real problem.
I don't like Google, and only use google when other search engines fail. But this article is BS.
Such a cute kitty snail! Can you post just the picture?
The point of it being open is that people can remove any censorship built into it.