Well, if they steal ideas but not the implementation, why would they have to mention them? Either way I'd say upstreaming GrapheneOS features is a win-win for all, including GrapheneOS itself.
madis
And is OpenAI somehow related to crypto?
Man, that original three tab layout is exactly what I want.
...but it has a built-in option to do so nowadays. So while you won't get in industry-wide change, you can still help your friends and relatives. Nowadays, any drawbacks are fairly small anyway, mostly to do with few broken site logins or not being able to use external comment forms (add an exception if you'd like).
Privacy Sandbox is the thing that tracks you on-device and sends the generic info to advertisers, something like "this user visits hotel websites".
I don't disagree, it's more of a matter of least evil.
But Chrome is already just Chromium with some binary blobs. Chromium itself even has sync and Google services at this point.
Besides, what would that change in regards to who develops it?
Of those companies, Apple seems like the best option due to their business goals (privacy). Though I am not fully sure why they'd want to as they already have a browser with a relative market share dominance and ecosystem.
Realistically, it would make sense to see Microsoft try again, it would instantly get 70% of the world to use "Edge", so their goals are met. Chrome already has the modern web standards, so it might just mean slower progression of the web in the future.
As long as they are doing the browser work independently from Google (meaning no Google integration), doesn't sound like a bad thing. Kind of like they already present their work (Chromium and Chrome)
It is curated by humans and only humans, so I don't see the relation to LLMs... Only problem is that it has a smaller userbase or arguments compared to actual comparison articles.