master5o1

I've always thought of these as basically a protection racket. Probably not literally, but close enough.

The PE teacher.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

$2m is only $40/week from 1000 people.

If your neighbour's donkey is eating your flowers you're entitled to ask them to move their fat ass.

Wouldn't it only cause an interference when adding or removing a joycon? ie, when the magnetic field change isn't from the joystick.

You're at a good age to do backpacking travel. Go explore the world.

The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

My brain skipped as I read Brennan and tabletop in the same sentence and jumped to Dropout/Dimension 20.

Even the phrase "improving the situation in Gaza" can be ambiguous.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.