npcknapsack

joined 9 months ago
[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Oh, St Luigi, may your blessings rain down upon this man.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

I am not feeling charitable this morning. I hope she gets frog marched into the desert to die like she wants for the refugees she hates.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

People don't believe me when I say avocados in the Toronto area are not good. "They're the same avocados!" they'll say, but I lived in SoCal and no, they are not the same damned avocados.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Google has all that fancy content ID. They choose not to use it to stop these deepfake scams, and they should be held liable for it.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cars? I don't hate cars. I hate that we're systematically defunding our health care to give people pointless tax breaks so that people will vote for Ford. Does 200$ really compensate anyone for having fewer doctors?

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Or maybe because we’d prefer to spend our money on reducing taxes for car owners…

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

It's weird to me that people frame it like "oh no! euthanasia is popular, someone figure out why so we can stop it!" The Guardian did something like this, too. But like, I think it should be much more popular. I think most deaths should be euthanasia. Don't most people want to die while surrounded by friends and family? Euthanasia is the best way to have that happen. That's not a culture of death, it's a culture of celebrating life. All of life, which includes death.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is even this politicized?

It always was... this was never about children or life. It has ever and always been about control. The death of these women is, at best, incidental, and at worst, intentional.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

.... Trump probably wants to get you on the crypto standard so he can make Bolsonaro coins a thing with a royalty to him. America is so fully mobbed up now, sanctioning judges...

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

People are "at risk"... of what? What a terrible article to not even clarify what the risk is. Because it sounds to me like the government is who put those people at risk by making them go look for solutions to a draconian policy.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If I'm opening a stock market account, I'm trusting them with generating my tax receipts! If I don't feel comfortable trusting them to hold my personal data directly, I probably should choose a different brokerage...

Edit: Anyways, I'm annoyed enough that everyone has gone to phone based 2 factor that requires me to buy a phone and keep it on a cell network, so you can imagine how much I despise even an easier version of this.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Sucks, because it's going global and we can't seem to stop it. I'm fine with laws to age gate in terms of a button you click. If some kid is willing to say they're 15... well, let's make sure people are treating them as a 15 year old. But... making everyone deal with real verification is at best going to further entrench big business, and at worst, destroy the internet we love. And it raises the question: are trans teenagers talking to each other now creating adult content because the UK hates trans people?

view more: ‹ prev next ›