No, but there are monthly updates on their YouTube channel, and they've made great progress!
percent
I remember Y2K
This kinda sounds similar to how things worked before GitHub, when people just emailed their git patches. Some OSS projects still work that way.
It just seems like a bad tactic. For example, if the US gives Ukraine some software that helps them fight Russia, it's likely tactically advantageous (to Ukraine) if Russia doesn't have the source code.
Of course, it doesn't mean Russia couldn't do some reverse engineering to some extent. But that takes time, and likely wouldn't be as complete/thorough as just handing them the source code.
Some, but probably not all. Seems like it would be a bad move to open-source all military software.
I remember when Rupert Murdoch's company, News Corporation, bought Myspace. Maybe US TikTok will see the same fate
Unpopular opinion: Memes like this just further divide the two sides.
Obviously both sides have crazy, inhumane people on the fringes. But most normal people, regardless of political leaning, did not laugh about any of those three deaths.
I'd suggest Cursor. I was somewhat anti-AI-coding until my job encouraged it, and Cursor (using Claude 4 Sonnet) gave me that "ohh, now I get it" moment.
It's still plenty capable of generating bad code, so it can take a bit of practice to get a feel for how to use it productively.
Fun fact: Base64url is not quite the same as base64. Its alphabet is slightly different from base64 so its characters can be used in more places (URLs, filenames, etc.).
I suppose the tool's name is more clear for those who are aware of those differences, but very unclear for others.
There's also that cultural shift that resulted in people's Teslas getting burned or vandalized. I would imagine that some many would-be Tesla buyers changed their minds because they wouldn't want their new car to get attacked.
So with the tax rebate ending and the Tesla destruction, I'm oddly kinda optimistic about that 6%. It's still progress
IMO, that site doesn't really look like it wants to succeed. Seems like the mobile apps are still in development, so maybe the site is intentionally like that, for now.
The most obvious difference: When I open that link, I see no video. If I open tiktok.com, I see a video.
That's just from a cursory look though. I've never heard of them, so I could easily be wrong.