pinhead77

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Mittlerweile haben ja schon einige große Onlinehändler einen Marktplatz in ihren Online-Shop integriert.

Auf anhieb fallen mir da z.B. ein:
Conrad.de Kaufland.de
Media Markt Otto.de
Voelkner.de
...

Für Bücher und Medien gibt es z.B. auch noch Booklooker.de

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To get a better impression, all that would be needed is for a few indie artists to disclose how their payout rate is calculated down to 1000 streams per provider...

I'm still waiting for a streaming provider that pays so fairly that the subscription fees are distributed proportionally to what the user has actually heard. For example, if I pay 12 €/month and have only listened to one artist in the whole month, it should be obvious that this artist gets, for example, 70% of the 12 € and the streaming provider gets the remaining 30%. But I'll probably have to wait forever for that...

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

And it turns out all services are intransparent. There are no hard facts and numbers. It’s massively complicated how they calculate these payouts and seems nobody publishes the exact maths behind it.

Yes, it is indeed a problem that almost no one discloses official numbers. Qobuz at least did this once: https://community.qobuz.com/press-de/qobuz-legt-als-erster-akteur-in-der-musikindustrie-seine-durchschnittliche-vergtung-pro-stream

There are some news articles with claims and speculation, but they’re all based on the same thing and mainly copy-paste each other.

Yes, I agree with you! Of course, these articles and figures are not reliable. Here is an article with payout numbers, which also goes into more detail about how the numbers came about: https://dynamoi.com/de/learn/statistics/what-streaming-platforms-actually-pay-per-stream

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

Sure, they are an option, too!

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Yes, but their payout is only slightly higher than Spotify...

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 27 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Here's a good read about streaming payouts in 2025: https://rebelmusicdistribution.com/2025/08/22/which-streaming-service-pays-the-most-per-1000-streams-in-2025-top-5-platforms/

Qobuz (who payout the most beside Napster) is a European company.

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 67 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Besides the political aspects... The main reason why Spotify should be boycotted is the fact that they exploit artists (small and large artists receive virtually nothing for their streamed music) and flood the market with AI-generated music...

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Have you already had a look at https://metager.de/?

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Bandwagon.fm is a great project, but unfortunately, ActivityPub/Federation is not yet reliably implemented and has too many bugs.

For example, if you follow a Pixelfed account and then unfollow, the follow remains on Pixelfed!

In my opinion, the ActivityPub part of bandwagon.fm is unfortunately not yet production-ready and should be tested and fixed more thoroughly.

 

As the title says, can I follow hashtags or searches on PieFed?

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Don't forget the instance operators! How can we get them more donations?

I recently found out about https://crowdbucks.fund/ (which is done for the Fediverse) and https://liberapay.com/

Maybe a first step would be to offer a native way to link to such donation platforms (link on the user profile, link on each posting, ...)

Also donations for the instance should be promoted more prominent.

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not everybody is so kind. In Germany, for example, lawyers are quite quick to issue cease-and-desist letters, which always involve costs. I've heard of Friendica instances that have already run into legal problems because, for example, copyrighted images were posted/federated. You're being a bit too naive about that.

[–] pinhead77@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The lack of monetization is certainly one reason. On the other hand, YouTube was already successful long before monetization existed.

 

I believe the biggest problem for PeerTube is copyright. YouTube thrives on user-generated content. I, for example, am involved in the live music scene (I go to concerts). It's common practice for recordings of concerts to be uploaded to YouTube. This is usually unproblematic until an artist objects to a particular video and demands its removal. Generally, YouTube has agreements with rights holders, so uploading recordings is usually not an issue.

This is different on PeerTube. Here, each instance is liable for its own content. If a user uploads copyrighted material, this can lead to problems for the instance operator or the user. Currently, PeerTube is still small enough that such content is possible. But if PeerTube were to become a real alternative to YouTube, it would become a problem!

Of course, content is also uploaded to YouTube that can cause problems for YouTube. But YouTube has enough lawyers and money to handle that. PeerTube operators, however, do not!

Therefore, in my opinion, the biggest problem is that PeerTube can't become a major YouTube alternative because users can't easily upload the same content as on YouTube.

What do you think?

 

I see a lot of communities that had no interaction in years. Also some community creators/moderators are inactive in the Threadiverse since the creation of the community.

So my questions are:

  1. Are communities kept forever also if there is no interaction for years?
  2. Are communities kept forever also if the moderator isn’t active anymore?
  3. Inactive communities can be spammed since there is no moderation?
  4. Is there a way to add a new moderator if the moderator of a community isn’t active anymore?
view more: next ›