prac

joined 1 week ago
[–] prac@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

So damn truee😂

[–] prac@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
[–] prac@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

don’t mind if i bite😉

[–] prac@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Idk, calling it ‘art’ feels like a reach. At the end of the day, it’s using someone’s real face for stuff they never agreed to. Fake or not, that’s still a massive violation of privacy.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (25 children)

This is messed up tbh. Using AI to undress people—especially kids—shouldn’t even be technically possible, let alone.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sacrificing an entire generation’s well-being just to keep the tax engine running is a wild strategy.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sacrificing an entire generation’s well-being just to keep the tax engine running is a wild strategy.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So the plan is just ‘hope they don’t know any better’? That’s even more depressing than the tax. It still doesn’t fix the fact that nobody can afford a house or daycare.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I guess ‘Large’ now stands for ‘Large Disappointment.’ Shrinkflation is getting out of hand.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Exactly—taxing condoms won’t pay for a house or a kid’s education. It’s just another way to avoid fixing the massive wealth gap that’s actually stopping people from starting families.

[–] prac@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Somebody is angry for sure

view more: next ›