psivchaz

Something has broken in a lot of brains. I think maybe it's the number of things they can keep track of. Why keep track of your expenses when you can just trust the president you voted for when he says prices are down?

Maybe I'm too easy to please but I'd be happier if they took the money that currently goes towards tanks and "how to shoot first" seminars and put it towards ongoing education for officers on law, de-escalation tactics, and critical thinking in stressful situations.

No fault divorce isn't about assigning blame. They actually still do that in certain situations, such as adultery or abuse. No fault divorce means that the state will allow a divorce even if no one is to "blame." Prior to that, you essentially needed a legal reason to get a divorce other than "I just want to be married to this person anymore."

AI could probably find the occasional actual bug. If you use AI to file 500 bug reports in the time it may take a researcher to find and report 1, and only 2 pay out, you've still gotten ahead.

But in the process, you've wasted tons of time for the developers who have to actually sort through, read the reports, and verify the validity of the issue. I think that's part of the problem. Even if it sometimes finds a legitimate issue, these people are trying to make it someone else's problem to do the real work.

In case you're curious why they might hate the post office so much, I suspect it's because as a government entity it has two important attributes:

• A requirement for universal access
• At least some constitutional protections for privacy.

When you ship UPS or FedEx, you're giving a package to a private entity. They are only bound by the contract they make with you. If they decide to start opening every package, that's their right. The USPS has specific laws around when it can and cannot search packages, and generally requires a warrant.

I really wanted to like that laptop but the screen is so incredibly glossy that unless you're in a totally dark room it becomes a mirror.

I know it's not what you're saying, probably, but just to be clear: It wasn't a good thing going just fine until the Germans took it too far. It sucked in Italy, too, and is always bad.

It's the state of advertising tbh. If ads were still of the "Look, here's a cool product" variety, or even the "Look, here's people happily using a cool product" kind then the world would probably be a better place. Even targeting isn't so bad, when it's broad like "We want businesses to know about our B2B product."

The evil in modern advertising is the overly specific targeting, the lying, the psychological tricks, and the way they seem to invade every possible space.

Have we considered calling it a tariff instead of a tax? Tariffs on all new plastic. It might work.

My favorite "we had to regulate this" is coal mining. You see, the larger a coal mine tunnel, the more work and time it takes. So smaller tunnels will be more profitable. So in some places they preferred smaller women and children, so they could make make smaller, easier tunnels. This one I only ever found one source on, but supposedly one mine owner noticed that snags on clothing were slowing things down in the narrow tunnels so he insisted on sending them in nude. Nothing more capitalist than naked coal mining children.

This is the only area I DO get. I don't agree with it, but I can understand where they're coming from. If you believe a fetus is a person, it makes total sense to vote against murder. And we aren't going to win anyone over by framing it as just an issue for women. If it's even possible to change someone's mind on the topic it would be through education, not telling them that their opinion on murder doesn't matter.

Okay but even if we forgive that, it looks like they're taking a picture of the ticket while driving.