pyska

joined 2 years ago
[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Man, I hate question headlines. They entice you to click a link while promising an answer that may not come. You do get ads, though.

Wish we lived in a society were titles were like:

  • Is global warming a hoax? No.
  • Are you eating microplastics? Probably.
  • Did the president have unspoken relationships with a donkey? No proof, but you are free to speculate.

Edit: Nothing against OP. I'm just venting about this little thing.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They aren't real "rights", but they are real. You just defined them.

I don't mean to be hard headed. I feel like I agree with you since the beginning on the idea of it. I'm just stuck on the "isn't real" part of it.

Because I can very easily say "rights" aren't real as well. It's just pixels on a screen. :)

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

No, it's in there. The "rights" are part of a number of societal rules which depend on the "dance" (of life). In this case, the fighting for said rights and communicating that they exist are part of the "dance".

The rest of it I was describing life, because consequences matter where I live at least. And since it seemed "natural rights" were bound only by the consequences you are willing to take, then they are the same as life itself, which I thought was pretty funny.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I mean, life is as life is. Would you stop talking on the street if society decides that is a crime, or if that means you'll be discriminated against? Some people might, but you can't expect everyone to do it.

It's all a big dance and societal rules fluctuate depending on who's dancing. You just gotta dare live life (preferably in a good way).

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It's ok, I hereby declare it is a natural right to face the consequences of your actions.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I think it's fair to say absolutely 0 cars is also a problem. But we could use a bit more public transport, and less cars than what we currently have. Especially where we know many people move "in mass", like cities in rush hour.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 years ago

In all of life there is a balance.

 

Learning implies change. To live implies change. Change is the only constant. Therefore, instead of fighting it, we should embrace it.

What experiences have you had with change?

I'll start:

As I've become more politically aware, I've become less and less willing to do hard work. I now do only what is asked of me, and no more. It started as a response to the inherent exploitation we are forced to participate, but it creeped into my own personal life. I have become "lazy", as I've become less and less engaged in my own personal projects. And while I tend to antagonize this part of myself, I've recently learned to be compassionate. I'm now slowly realizing how much I overworked myself, and how toxic my relationship to work was. I'm slowly enjoying life a bit more every day, and even though I feel like I'm going "slower", I no longer think that's necessarily a bad thing. It's ok to smell the roses sometimes.

There is still a sour feeling in me of how much more I would be willing to do if the result of such work benefited society directly. But I can't just will a different economic system into existence, so I need to learn to let go. We need to pick and choose our battles.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

After reading your comment I agree with you. I was being fat-phobic inadvertently.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Ah, I see. I tunnel-vision'd on that one comment. But ye, that's a fair point.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it OK to mock the femininity of a gay right winger? He could act straight with a “kick in the butt”

Then what did you mean by this question?

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

So, I don't think it's ok to be fat phobic. Someone's personal appearance should not be shamed, just for the heck of it. However, the topic of fat phobia will appear with greater frequency (whether for or against) in political communities. That's what I'm pointing at.

And to choose a political community as one's safe space means that sometimes the conversation will come up, and some people who disagree will show up. I find it rather "safer" to engage in non-political activities and leave all of this discourse somewhere else. As if saying "I'm ok with who I am, so instead of seeking validation online, I will do what I want to do.".

If I somehow said fat-phobia is okay, that was not at all my intention, so I apologize for that.

view more: next ›