quirzle

joined 2 years ago
[–] quirzle@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] quirzle@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I bet a lot of folks have just quietly given up or moved to lemmy or mbin because they’ve gotten frustrated with all the issues.

I guess it's not quiet once I post this, but I submitted the account deletion request a couple weeks back and spent some time setting my feedly back up after 1 too many spam posts. I'm already getting my scrolling fix from rss feeds again, and this is the first time I've been on kbin in a week.

tl;dr: you're right.

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Incognito mode has always been intended for prying eyes using the same browser, and it works fine for that.

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like right after 9/11...

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty much. You can download images with everything bundled and ready to go (e.g., deploy a new container image instead of upgrading your Radarr version in place) and keep them separate (e.g., Torrent container goes through vpn but your media server doesn't, Radarr upgrade going south won't affect your Sonarr install, etc.)

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Until some legal entity decides to raid the servers. Pray they do not keep logs of IPs. Though usually this may be (to some extent) a gray zone in some countries.

Can you give an example? I don't think accessing a file somebody makes available has ever been an issue with copyright prosecution. They go after uploaders and hosts.

Even if they did, an IP in a server log isn't definitive proof of an individual accessing something. However, I'm less confident of worldwide legal systems understanding that. Still, I'd be curious if there's a single example of somebody being charged over accessing publicly accessible copyrighted files on the web.

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said they're exclusive; I use both in my workflow. The comment to which I replied made it seem like private trackers were the end-all though, which I took issue with.

I also think your upsides are a bit misleading. I wouldn't use torrents without a VPN (upfront cash), and the effort to learn how usenet works isn't any more daunting than the effort needed to get into good private trackers and keep up the ratios (e.g., tracking time/ratio based on tracker, working with hardlinks, etc.).

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Or the weapons. Have to imagine there's a pretty wide disparity between the police and average citizens. If Prigozhin/Wagner couldn't get it done, it's not exactly a simple task for some politically progressive average folks.

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

How to pirate movies as a pro

No mention of Usenet

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I got ya. I'm agreeing that he's a coward and an idiot, but disagreeing that he might not have been trying to murder a guy. He might not have believed it was murder, because of the idiot part...but the video convinced me he was intentionally trying to kill the unarmed man in the back of his car.

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

At an active threat, sure. When the dude's been searched, handcuffed, and trapped in the back of a car...there's some personal responsibility, imo.

view more: next ›