ragepaw

Im with you. I don't belittle or make fun of anyone's disabilities... unless they do it to others... and he does...

Fuck him and his shit filled diaper.

I'm still on usenet.

19/20. Only because I refused to use AOL.

Plus, any half competent sonar operator will hear them on the other side of the ocean.

I got a 24 hour ban for saying Danielle Smith should stand on her head so the blood will rush to get brain and she could have a coherent thought. "Promoting Violence"

I got a 72 hour ban for responding to someone who said Vance will never be US President. I said he would when Trump had the inevitable coronary from eating too many cheeseburgers. "Promoting violence"

Perma-ban for responding to a story about Kristi Noem telling Canada how to run border security with saying she should keep her cunt ass on her side of the border. "Inciting violence".

Reddit WANTS to be a right wing echo chamber and looks for excuses to ban people who don't agree with that world view.

Hillary Clinton is a classic example of you can say the right things, but if you're a smug asshole about it, people won't like you. She never got that, and apparently still doesn't.

To be clear, Israel is committing genocide, but she's right about the fact that TikTok is full of fake bullshit. Both are true.

But she is so fucking smug and self righteous, that even when she says something I agree with, I just want to tell her to fuck off.

When they say they can recover it, but will not recover it, it is indeed on them.

Especially since, I have the password. It didn't work and my recovery phrase didn't either. That's a technical issue. Something happened to my account.

And they told me that the email they sent me about the account validating it was mine, was not proof enough that the account was mine. Still on them.

My experience with Proton was not great. I signed up, with the intention of switching. Had some IRL stuff come up, so while I was using it, I hadn't migrated everything and it was a good thing I didn't. I had a password issue. I couldn't sign in. I admit, I should have setup the recovery email, but I'm a dumbass.

So, I opened a ticket, and in the end, they couldn't help me. Even though I had the recovery phrase (which didn't work), and I had the email verification they sent me with the date, time and header info showing it came from them to me, and the mail ID. Even though I had that, they wouldn't consider it proof that I setup the account and wouldn't recover it for me.

And because they won't reuse email addresses, I lost my email address.

To me, the only part that was my fault was not setting up a recovery email. I still have my username and password in my password manager. But not being able to recover it, when it just stopped working, and I couldn't get my account back, is on them.

So many things wrong with this.

I am not a programmer by trade, and even though I learned programming in school, it's not a thing I want to spend a lot of time doing, so I do use AI when I need to generate code.

But I have a few HARD rules.

1. I execute all code and commands. Nothing gets to run on my system without me.

2. Anything which can be even remotely destructive, must be flagged and not even shown to me, until I agree to the risk.

3. All information and commands must be verifiable by sourcing documentary links, or providing context links that I can peruse. If documentary evidence is not available, it must provide a rationale why I should execute what it generates.

4. Every command must be accompanied by a description of what the command will do, what each flag means, and what the expected outcome is.

5. I am the final authority on all matters. It is allowed to make suggestions, but never changes without my approval.

Without these constraints, I won't trust it. Even then, I read all of the code it generates and verify it myself, so in the end, if it blows something up, I bear sole responsibility.

It doesn't even matter. That chud would be upset if the same happened in reverse, if someone hid meat is their food without telling them.

The problem here is that they have an agenda, and all actions are OK if it means their agenda is met. It's about, "the ends justify the means".

People who feel "I'm OK with deceiving someone who disagrees with me" are the worst kind of people. They treat their point of view as the one truth and any action can be justified if it meets the needs of the one truth.

Are you really that obtuse?

The problem isn't the food, it's the lie. Maybe you don't have a problem with being lied, but the rest of us do.

Because i don't like being deceived.