redfox

I see where your head's at a little, but I will blame him mostly.

As the elected representative, it's his job to represent the voters, population, community, etc. and make decisions the represent those voters or their best interests. If he isn't being reelected, then he has failed to do that satisfactory enough to maintain their confidence.

If he doesn't get the fence/middle/republocrats, then there is something wrong, especially when he's up against a fuck.

Will I blame the voters? Some. The society should only elect people that best represent their values. Americans choices are only these two. If we elect a fuck, either the other choice was terrible, or the people are terrible, or both.

Will he though? (stop supporting their war)

If you wanted to force Biden to stop supporting a war, you'd do it with the vote. He'd have to change his policies to better reflect the majority, or his supporters. But in this case, it's him or fuck.

Since there's only two choices, the non fuck followers aren't going to vote for fuck, so that only leaves Biden. I don't believe he has to change anything.

And yes, I believe it's totally acceptable and reasonable to not like either choice in this matter. In a system of only two choices, each choice can and often does have cons, as well as pros. To think one side is infallible would be unreasonable. I hate both parties, but for largely different reasons.

Not going to vote for fuck, but I don't like Biden either.

Also, what if a person likes workspace safety and collective bargaining, but dislikes watching shitty, lazy employees not get fired and hold up good positions protected by union reps and policies? So it is morally compromising to not like part of unions? What about the moral compromising of shitty employees being a drain on a company and all its employees (not just the top rich bastards)? What if I don't support that?

For all information workers who can do our job anywhere, I thoroughly enjoy watching companies go to shit after they pull RTO. So, I definitely enjoy seeing studies that back this up with metrics, performance data, financials, etc.

Some people are stuck with these employers, due to some life circumstances. I am sorry to anyone who either lost their new found freedom and the work/life balanced they probably always wanted, but didn't know they could have.

Some people are lucky and can move on, and every time someone does, it reenforces the idea that people won't tolerate having a boot on their neck, or maybe they care less about greed and stuff and more about balance. To each their own.

OMG, with this being the millionth your version of left/right isn't mine, can we pick a new scale?

There has got to be a better way to frame ideology that's more consistent or universal.

Another excellent example of strawman.

What if those aren't examples of a properly functioning right-wing state?

They sound more theocracy based. From your examples in order:

• Banning blasphemy
• Religious misogyny
• Religious purity
• cult leader

Is this your field? I figured making people do some form of certification was more for the purposes of hygiene and preventing diseases.

I used to think that the type of hatred displayed by the filth guy was a small backwards group ina larger whole, but I'm not seeing anyone else in the larger whole, who might be less ridiculous, saying anything about the fridges. It makes them all appear the same.

This is a basic example of issues caused by not policing extremist views within your own group, or a group being too big and not representing the majority of people's views.

Until you need one.

This is a total strawman.

It's an nonsense response to a concept that should be considered reasonable.

Bringing up the KKK in the concept of general problem solving views is a distraction from consideration that reasonable people can solve problems. It exaggerates reasonable people with those who are not.

Nobody but KKK considers them reasonable.

I generally agree. All the loudest people are on the edges.

I see so many people take the stance that because there are extreme opinions on the other side, the entire other side is evil.

I feel people take an extreme stance because of other people's extreme stances. It's a cycle someone has to break.

I would love to see parties disappear or more show up. I'm sure there's pros/cons to each.

Edit, I also see politicians on each edge that have millions of dollars. Some didn't start out as rich as they are, but boy are they rich now. Johnny Harris illustrated this pretty well in a video he did.

So three people down voted a question, but didn't take the time to respond...

Does that mean, no interest in info security,? Or disagrees with post? Or wants to see less posts about community interests?