There's so many liers everywhere, how do you even determine misinformation anymore?
How do fact check things and hide it if it's BS?
redfox
joined 2 years ago
You only listed 5 ;)
Was tempted to downvote you
I agree with the sentiment behind:
chill, internet points aren’t a big deal
I understand wanting other people to support a cause you have passion about. I also understand being affected by people's nagative reactions to your contributions, comments, or intent.
I encourage building some defenses, trying to be self aware when this happens, and try to remember this doesn't really matter. Good thoughts, reason, logic, and civil discourse is fun/challenging/important.
I definitely have unpopular opinions here. I keep asking loads of questions trying to pry at why/how people think what they do, especially if it's the opposite of me. I'm not interested in changing their minds, I don't care. I want to know how their mind works, why they think the way they do, and should I reconsider my positions and thoughts based on some perspective I didn't have.
Also, sometimes people use votes for agreement/disagreement, and sometimes its to represent they want to see more or less of something. It can be difficult to tell the difference when the two ideas aren't the same. Sometimes I don't disagree with a person, I just wish convey I'd like to see less of that, like super low effort shitty comments. Unless they're really funny, then by all means :)
Here's the find your legislator site for sending messages to state legislators if anyone is interested: https://iga.in.gov/information/find-legislators
They'll need to start consuming all that extra electricity to power LLMs to analyze climate change data🤔
Dude, I'm saving all these posts for both of us. Thank you for the details. I hope your journey keeping being positive.
If you use your email address, they can follow you everywhere. Unless you create tons of throw away emails.
These are good points, well said.
I agree. Insert great power/responsibility saying.
They always seem to go off the rails.
I would be in favor of mandatory disclosure (though, this would be extremely difficult and costly). I imagine anytime a government privilege was used, especially when behind closed doors, and reviewed by "...the proper oversight officials...", whoever that means, I would rather like the governments to prove it.
I would support an idea that by law, it all has to be documented, and after a reasonable amount of time after the prosecution is complete, they have to disclose everything they did, all the snooping, etc. With redacted private information of course for unrelated people.
This is fairly unreasonable/unrealistic. But for me, if you could see all the cases where a government invaded privacy and link it to all to nothing but legitimate uses, it might help restore some faith/trust in officials.
Since I also appreciate EUs privacy mindset, and you guys actually mentioned interesting things about the various populations, I'm going to post devil's advocate question:
Is there anything to allow privacy invasion we should do for law enforcement and CSAM? Since that's all political excuses for it?
Here's a story I heard recently that talks about it from a technician cyber crime podcast: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/131/
Disclaimer: I cried while on a run in the middle of a populated area.
My emotions on the topic go from shock and sadness to the punisher style rage, and what vigilante justice.
There's also apps like kik, where apparently this shit is unchecked.
So my question is, can we all have our no data collection privacy, but still give law enforcement a way to hunt these pieces of shit into extinction without them overreaching?
lifestyle choices
lol, you should have made better choices with the ? thing you can control of those.
/s
Thanks for thorough and personal experiences.
A buddy of mine who's struggling and has for most of his life, has had a few very bad recent years. He's been on everything ever, they're wrecking his body, and he can't tolerate meds much anymore. We're holding hope this might be a possibility one day.
I like the model of studies I've seen where it's supervised. Like you said, taking a big boy dose to me isn't something I would want to play around with.
Did you ever do the form of micro dose described as people not even aware or undetectable affects? Like you could safely drive or go to work? Or does this always mean you'll need a setup a time or block for use, with recovery or cool down time before doing something else?
I'm hoping to get rid of my own pills too.
Yeah, the second anyone posts anything to any service, all their house are belong to the evil corp...
I just blended two references...