you don't...
I also feel like the amount of code they had to write with the CBVs was ridiculous, and it's not the easiest thing to read.
To me, this could have been done much simpler and more readable with a plain function view.
you don't...
I also feel like the amount of code they had to write with the CBVs was ridiculous, and it's not the easiest thing to read.
To me, this could have been done much simpler and more readable with a plain function view.
The article starts out talking about malicious bots that DoS your site, but how would a crypto signature fix that? Couldn't the client just change the signature whenever it gets blocked?
tl;dr OPSEC failure as always
How do you know you don't like something if you've never used it?
not MS-DOS Edit
sad.
There is, just google something like "url redirection service" and you'll find lots. Your domain/DNS provider may already offer one as well.
Not strictly within the normal way DNS works, no. A CNAME record response can only contain another domain or subdomain name. You would have to run a webserver that listens on the IP that the CNAME record eventually pointed to, in order to handle redirections to a specific URL.
digital violence?
What frustrates me is that it's almost impossible to find a platform for real-time chat for technical subjects that aren't completely dominated with this type of person filling the logs 24/7 and just making the whole experience exhausting.
So when that gets blocked, they can just generate a new key. I don't see how this really stops anyone that wants to keep going.