So then it's not really a blanket "no-AI" rule if it can't be enforceable if it's good enough? I suppose the rule should have been "no obviously bad AI" or some other equally subjective thing?
refalo
joined 2 years ago
It's not, labels were always written that way. They went into a box where the slide was facing down so the label was always visible at the top.
besides uncompressing itself, there will be other info that is needed at runtime that requires dynamic memory allocation beyond the size of the kernel itself, like hardware/memory maps, framebuffers, filesystem/networking stuff, caches etc.
How is AI-generated content detected and what is the process for disputing such claims?
Besides the fact that I highly doubt this will ever pass...
I think if it did, it would greatly increase the adoption of decentralized platforms.
If websites become responsible for user-generated content, they will just refuse to allow user-generated content in the first place, leading to an explosion in alternative services that are not beholden to the actions of one company that could be compelled to act a certain way.
If your worried about us intelligence monitoring traffic then it’s not a good fit
source:
It's explained in great detail on the website
What is your definition of TV in this context? All of these are 55"+, some even show pictures of it in a living room...
I would say that's ridiculous for most people, but I guess it entirely depends on your threat model... if you're legitimately worried about state-level boogeymen, you've probably got bigger problems and already know all of this.