schnoopy

joined 4 months ago
[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It has been ages since I've read them but anathem is definitely his best work. I did really enjoy zodiac, snowcrash, and the cryptonomicon when I read them ~15 years ago though.

His books are always a bit libertarian (usa meaning, derogatory) although snowcrash is a very funny send up of what that might actually look like if adopted wholeheartedly so idk how much they can be said to endorse it wholeheartedly.

Some of it reminds me of the incoherence of Pratchett's politics. A sort of "Just let smart people with good values do what they want and things will be ok" without establishing how you determine who that applies to or really sitting with how fragile that is.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago

Damn, imagine living in this world and being like "You know, those people who'd keep women chained to the house, kill the gays, force a state religion on people, and segregated society have some good points"

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

So I love Neal's books, I think he's a fun story-teller and anathems orbital mechanics scene has loads more tension than any slop in something like interstellar.

But whenever he gets involved in social-technological commentary I am reminded of Ursala Le Guinn's remarks on SciFi authors being professional liars, not prophets.

Anyway, scour the submissions for little Lytton contest entrants

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

I've been learning how to make video games (exercise in remembering there are things I love about programming and it's not all awful) and I got an attack animation on an enemy working :)

Haven't been this into something since I was a young kid making physics simulations back in uni. Turns out software can actually be loads of fun when you're not just processing bank transactions and shit.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The defensiveness that people have learned to write online with is truly a tragic marker of our times. It didn't even cross my mind you would be pro-malaria.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I was pretty disgusted by that. It seems like the guy's crimes were some poor citation (he did cite the academic he alledgedly plagiarised so obviously it's not plagiarism lol) and maybe exaggerating some of his life?

Seeing the media go from uncritically regurgitating a racist's allegation, to reporting about the allegation controversy, to uncritically reporting what people claim to have or have not remembered about his life from 30 years ago, to digging through his entire life. For, I'll reiterate, maybe citing something badly and doing some sloppy scholarship.

You know, the thing that gets someone a disciplinary chat and maybe a bump down if anything.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

In my brief foray into it, actually I met singer once lol at a lunch about it, no. Really just that it's a cheap way to save people that were otherwise ignored because of racism.

You still encounter disgusting narratives about overpopulation and people living in Africa, despite most of these people's resource consumption and thus strain on the world being completely negligible compared to the sort of people that love making those arguments.

Malaria is suuuuper upsetting and preventable.

There were always racists in the movement and its ideological foundations are shakey but they didn't have hegemony at the start.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago

Class consciousness in software is in the abyss, I have worked with people who didn't know that sick leave was won through the labour movement and not something that "just made sense" to do.

That doesn't change their class interests, it just means they behave ignorantly (in a way that hurts other workers but that's why they need education, not isolation).

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago

Misusing a defined term (petty bourgeois) to make your argument look more tied to historical ones is kinda fucking fail for a historian

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago

Most managers are still primarily reliant on selling their own wage labour and do not own the means of production. Their power is highly constrained (literally just where they work, limited ability to control the circumstances of their work) and they are subject to the whims of those who own the means of production.

Getting more favourable terms to keep other workers in line does not fundamentally change your class interests but it does give you peverse incentives to harm your own class (which in the long run fucks you, e.g. you need sick leave too).

Deceiving workers about their class interests to divide us is a tactic of the capitalists and we don't need to help them with that.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Emacs is so wonderfully capable I'm pretty sure we're all just running in an emacs buffer somewhere. Nothing built by humans could be so nice.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

piiiiisssssssss

My fucking eyes can't they see how ugly their shit always is?

Sloppers hold up the ugliest, most artistically meritless shit while going "Oh yeah? what about this!?"

view more: next ›