The kind of people they're pissing off with this, are the same people most likely to switch to bittorrent.
skisnow
joined 9 months ago
She does look like she'd get cast as B.A. Baracus in the inevitable all-female reboot
Not even a good film.
One quirk of github copilot is that because it lets you choose which model to send a question to, you can gaslight Opus into apologising for something that gpt-4o told you.
One of the many stupid things about it is that generally speaking, most measures to reduce cars have the effect of making car travel more pleasant. It's building tons of extra lanes that drives its own demand and makes driving slow and unpleasant.
I recently had an interaction where it made a really weird comment about a function that didn't make sense, and when I asked it to explain what it meant, it said "let me have another look at the code to see what I meant", and made up something even more nonsensical.
It's clear why it happened as well; when I asked it to explain itself, it had no access to its state of mind when it made the original statement; it has no memory of its own beyond the text the middleware feeds it each time. It was essentially being asked to explain what someone who wrote what it wrote, might have been thinking.
She only looks cool because she looks like she's part of a rag-tag team of underdogs who infiltrated the courtroom to bust him out. She probably has telekinetic powers.
Yes that puzzled me too, I checked like 5 different transcripts and they all said the same thing.
The swallow may fly south with the sun, or the house-martin or the plumber may seek warmer climes in winter; yet these are not strangers to our land.
“Come on Kash, let’s take a picture to show them you’re doing a great job!’” Leavitt wrote, attaching a photo of the pair smiling and giving a thumbs up.
The fact that they think a photo of them smiling shows they're doing a great job, tells you everything you need to know about their competence.
The problem there is that a religious text loses its authority if it’s full of demonstrably incorrect statements. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
Once you’ve decided that you can just ignore anything that looks wrong, the Bible stops being a source of truth and becomes a Rorschach ink blot for you to see whatever you want in it.
The current MAGA position seems to be that they weren't children, they were just very very very young adults...