snaggen

joined 2 years ago
[–] snaggen@programming.dev 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, it is not based on Gnome. It is a full DE environment written in rust.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago

Not the latest, but one of the biggest improvements was the Ultimate Hacking Keyboard. Now I have programmed the keyboard to have VIM navigation at the keyboard level. The latest was switching to neovim and setting it up properly.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course cars would loose if you tried to use it to travel across the Atlantic...

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

But per mile measurement for flying implies that every mile of a flight is equally dangerous, but the truth I'd that it is most dangerous to start or land, which is a per trip occurrence. The take off and landing is equally dangerous whether you travel a long or short distance in between.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And the question is am I going to die on this trip? And there the real statistics are pretty clear, cars are safer.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Well, what I want to know is "Am I going to die today?". The distance traveled is irrelevant to answer that question. The only reason to add that to the equation is to make air travel look safer.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Per trip is more in line with how people think about danger. Like, am I going to die on this trip?

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (13 children)

I think you underestimate the number of trips per car per day. Most people will take more trips by car per month than they will fly for their lifetime. In Sweden , a country of 10 million, we have about 150 people killed per year from car accidents, yet most adults travel by car daily. That is millions of trips per day, and only half a death.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One breaking change, that they doesn't list as breaking (I guess since I assume the old was always broken) is: Dynamic registration of LSP capabilities. An implication of this change is that checking a client's server_capabilities is no longer a sufficient indicator to see if a server supports a feature. Instead use client.supports_method(). It considers both the dynamic capabilities and static server_capabilities.

So if you had code like

if client.server_capabilities.inlayHintProvider then
...
end

you now should use

if client.supports_method("inlayHintProvider") then
...
end

So, not really a breaking change I guess, but something you should change any way.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 38 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You are confusing Google and Internet.... they are very different things.

view more: ‹ prev next ›