Yes, you're right, the US has shut down so much positive change in the middle east. It seems like the other day that i read about how the US effectively destroyed the democratic Iranian government, and installed a puppet religious fundamental government.
I suppose it makes sense for the US to impose a fundamentalist government, they just want the middle east to be like themselves
Well, for weeks before the Houthis said that the reason for the blockade is Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza. And that once Israel ceases their attacks on Gaza they would end the blockade.
Instead of using their political leverage to get Israel to stop their bombing, and thereby ensuring the end of the Houthi blockade, the US is instead attacking the Houthis and providing even more cover to Israel to continue it's genocide.
But yes, of course the US and allies would value the delays of shipments and providing genocide cover for Israel more than stopping an ongoing genocide against Palestinians
And yes, it's a major worldwide shipment route. So why does the US not use their political capital to stop Israel and thereby the blockade instead of attacking the Houthis on their own territory and greatly exacerbating tensions in the region.
That is why i said that there is a disconnect in what the US says and what it does. It has a diplomatic route to take but instead starts warring. And no, saying that the Houthis should just stop the blockade without Israel stopping it's genocide is not a valid diplomatic route.
So that begs the question if the US is truly concerned with the blockade of a major shipping route or if they're simply providing cover for Israel to continue bombing Gaza and terrorising the West Bank.
Replying from my alt account
YoBuckStopsHere was removed as mod for abuse from the different politics and world politics communities of lemmy.world.
I see that ever since then he's been spamming posts over in this community.
I feel like nowadays news from The Onion is more accurate than what is actually reported by news networks
Hehe yep
Edit: and i just realised i posted this from my other account and not my dbzer0 account lol. But point still stands
While this is good, i would have hoped that the secretary general would have used much more strong language at this point.
He should have absolutely condemned the mass murder perpetrated by Israel and called for a total ceasefire, not a humanitarian ceasefire.
He could have at least done that much, since not many in power are willing to call what is happening a genocide and ethnic cleansing, even though that is what's happening.
Exactly. People don't want to accept it but i see a lot of parallels between MK and Qassam brigades as liberation armed struggle. When peaceful protest fails then violent opposition is inevitable.
Just fyi. Apartheid didn't end because of peaceful protest.
The ANC had been peacefully opposing the Apartheid government. But that all ended after the Sharpeville massacre commited by the Apartheid government.
Then MK was formed ( uMkhonto we Sizwe). MK was the armed guerilla resistance that Mandela and the ANC saw was needed, because the Apartheid government wasn't giving in to peaceful opposition of their government.
You're probably confusing what people say was a 'peaceful' end to Apartheid because civil war was avoided.
And it was only truly avoided because the resistance had to make so many unfair concessions to the international liberal powers that be ( imf, the US etc.) and the Apartheid government. Otherwise the Apartheid government was gearing up to actually start mass murdering the non white population (aka genocide).
There truly are a lot of parallels between Apartheid south africa and israel
Lets see, there was that big Transnet coal train collision. There was that huge fire in Pringle Bay that was truly bad. Haven't heard much else, but i'm sure i missed a lot.
I suppose those could be normal accidents, but i've been more suspicious of these kind of events ever since the ICJ ruling. I know they can fuck up a country while making it look like a series of accidents.