testfactor

joined 2 years ago
[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago

In addition to what everyone else said, property damage is a big part of it as well.

Let's say you run into a building and knock out a load bearing wall. Or plough through a business or government office. It's not impossible to rack up a couple million in damages if you crash bad enough.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 93 points 4 days ago (19 children)

The biggest thing with auto insurance isn't covering your car, it's covering the cost of whatever you hit sueing you.

Your car may only be worth $3,000, but if you hit a pedestrian and they require a dozen surgeries and are wheelchair bound for life, you bet you're ass you're getting sued for a few million in medical costs.

In a reasonable country, those medical costs would be free, but since they're not you need some sort of protection against once accident bankrupting you in civil suits.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Tbf, I doubt he made a video, as he died in 1883, lol.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago (2 children)

/c/im14andthisisdeep

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this one clearly reads as satire. The fact that people think it's not is wild to me.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While I don't disagree, I do feel like people are over-quick to label any hard questions that don't align with thier viewpoint as sealioning.

I've more than once asked questions about the practicality or edge cases of a particular stance and been called a sealion for it.

But the thing is, I want to know how that thing handles the practicality or edge case issues, and am trying to have someone who is deeper into the weeds on the issue than I am explain it to me, but just get called a sealion for it.

To be fair, this has only happened to me 2-3 times, but it's super annoying, because I'm actually trying to understand, and might even be on your side if you'd address my concerns.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ngl, I saw this and was like, effing chatgpt garbage, and down voted.

Then I realized the joke and upvoted. You got me on that one.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sure, but that's not what the article is saying, to be clear.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To clarify, the article is just saying that it's wildly unfeasible and prohibitively expensive.

They're not saying it's dangerous or going to harm people in some way.

I feel like some people may get the wrong idea from the headline.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

What makes you think you can't leave a significant positive legacy?

You can get involved with your neighbors. Invest in your local community. Adopt an orphan or volunteer at a women's shelter.

There's a million things you can do to make a significant impact. Every person you invest in is another person who can go and invest in others.

This idea that anything that's below the national or worldwide level isn't significant is a cancer on society.

There are people who lived hundreds of years ago who, sure, you'll probably have never heard of if you don't live in the same area as me, but who have had huge impact on the community. The same is true for where you live. I promise you.

Bring your eyes down, and look to make your legacy local. I promise you it's possible. And I promise you that it's significant.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think the controversial bit, is that it's thanking a rival nation for invading and committing atrocities.

It'd be like if Zelensky came out and thanked Putin for invading Ukraine, as it let him be president over a more united country.

Sure, maybe technically correct, but people probably would be (rightfully) pretty pissed if he said it.

 

Okay, I read a story someone linked here a while back and I'm trying to remember the title.

The story was structured as an old school web forum where people were discussing the meaning behind certain lines of an ancient poem.

The poem described a malevolent force in the woods associated with a particular kind of tree that would, cyclically, take people from the town.  Maybe oak?  Ash?

I think that the person taken was turned into wood in after being lured in by a beautiful girl.

One user on the forum was trying to trace the historical roots of the poem and managed to find the town he believes was the one referenced in the poem.  They had a yearly festival that included cutting down all the trees of that type and burning them.

In the end, they guy researching is presumably taken by the forest, after some events outlined in the poem begin to happen again and then he stops posting.

Any guesses?

Edit: I found it. Managed to piece together enough memories to get there. Title was "Where Oaken Hearts do Gather" https://www.uncannymagazine.com/article/where-oaken-hearts-do-gather/

view more: next ›