I got this bike a year ago and it was the best decision I ever made regarding my personal transportation. I'm so glad to see the wider biking community take notice of this lower end of the market.
theplanlessman
joined 2 years ago
Well I certainly wouldn't want to change my pupils without their consent, that's for sure!
It's English, but not as we know it, Jim.
Translated it reads: "The Liberal Democratic Party will ruin everything" competition between two left-wing parties in mid-Bedfordshire by-election could split votes and result in a win by the Conservative Party.
This reminds me of two recent posts that I got involved in here.
The first was about Wales' upcoming 20mph zone, where people were complaining that "they're just trying to generate revenue". Well, only if you decide to break the law, surely?
The other was a discussion on the cyclists who were "caught" speeding in Devon. Drivers were outraged and wanted cyclists to adhere to the speed limits (good luck without a speedometer). But they would get apoplectic when you suggested that they should do the same.
As a cyclist it always strikes me that we probably don't need any new laws to make the roads safe, we just need the current laws to be enforced and obeyed. If every driver gave every cyclist 1.5m of space, priority at junctions, kept out of the cycle lanes, etc. as they'resupposed to then the roads would be a lovely place to cycle.
FYI the English name of that cask is "tun".
Workplace showers do seem to be more common nowadays (including at my wife's office), but it's addressing the symptom rather than the cause, I feel. Better bike infrastructure won't stop you getting rained on, but it'll make riding in the rain much more tolerable, turning more of those fair weather cyclists into just plain cyclists.
Besides the cost, which he covers fairly well in the video, I've found the biggest block to people fully replacing their cars with a bike/e-bike is their willingness to ride in bad weather. My wife has an e-bike that she bought on the cycle to work scheme and commutes on it when the weather is good, but she absolutely refuses to ride it in wet or very cold conditions. And to be honest I can't really blame her. Inconsiderate drivers can be infuriating in ideal conditions, but when they're forcing you into a gutter full of rainwater or sending sprays of dirty water your way as they close pass you I can understand why anyone would think twice about riding in those conditions.
The bicycle industry really needs to settle on a singe bottom bracket standard. It's not like there's a significant difference in performance from the million different variations. An industry-standard rear derailleur hanger would also save a lot of headaches where people try to hunt down a replacement for a frame that's been out of production for years.
As mentioned in the article the American Bully XL isn't a recognised breed, so the name likely came from the owners themselves making it up.
This has always been the case in the UK and I hate it. My city actually planned on banning it on two of the busiest roads in the city (because obviously people constantly pulling in and out of traffic will always make it worse), but the drivers protested and now the plan is scrapped.
Ah, that makes sense. For what it's worth I think you guys are on the right track with e-bikes; allow more powerful motors but give them a different classification.
What are things like on that side of the pond? The "20's plenty" campaign is well underway over here, do you have similar movements in the US?
For what it's worth the UK uses mph and we've had the Internet for a little while now too, and here e-scooters are technically illegal to ride anywhere other than on private land, i.e. not on pavement, on bike lanes or on the road.
The exception is if you're in one of the cities which is operating a "trial" rental scheme, in which case the rental company will let you know where they think you should ride. But I believe even in those areas privately owned e-scooters remain illegal to use in public.