If you go through that user's other reviews, while they are very funny, they're also very AI generated. Tons of contrivances and the classic "and honestly?"
They were almost all posted on April 13th, and they all drop the "brand name" of the product in just really unnatural ways. This is 1,000% a bot.
Do go visit the profile though. The sex toy reviews are pretty funny.
If you want some quick examples of how this is obviously AI:
Ah I see. I've gotten into some back and forth with the maintainer of Caddy about these build inconsistencies and lack of versioning, and he responded by locking issues on me... twice.
After that communication, I resigned to just keep things as they are because upstream is not willing to make the experience better for use cases like these.
He is impossible to work with, but Caddy is just really good :/
What issue did you have? If I can handle it for the user automatically, I can add a best effort attempt to avoid it.
Hi!
The project is still active! I just haven't needed to develop any updates because it's currently stable, and the upstream Docker compose template, which is a reference for my project, hasn't changed in 9 months:
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ansible/blob/main/templates/docker-compose.yml
Whenever Lemmy releases a new Docker container, it will just pull the latest one automatically. This will continue to be compatible indefinitely until the compose deployment (linked above) has any breaking changes added to it that I need to incorporate.
Thank you for the shout out :)
Ah I see, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining, I learned something from your comment and the other one.
I am not up to date on all these license debates, but don't you think equating Alpine Linux to "locked down DRM" is just a bit of a logical reach?
Alpine and its components are fully open source, you can make whatever changes you want to them. I am not seeing the argument here.
The people downvoting you have never experienced perfectly regular trees (and don't understand CrossCode inside jokes).
They explain it in the video. They already use algorithms to detect if things are buildings or not.
But if their algorithm can't make a determination or is uncertain below a certain threshold, they send it to Maptcha to get a bulk human opinion.
That's not the person I originally asked.
The person I asked actually did reply to me on this thread... but didn't answer how they know all this.
How do you know all of this?
I just want a reasonably priced generational bump over the Index. Most PCVR headsets that have pancake lenses are either obscenely priced, are ridiculously heavy, or have reportedly terrible QA. From what I've seen lately, usually all three are true.
You can get close in features and price with something like a Pico or a Quest, but they lack direct DisplayPort connection, so it's compressed wireless PCVR, compressed "wired" PCVR (which basically uses a networking protocol anyway), or no PCVR at all.
Myself, and I'm sure a ton of other people, are hoping for the Deckard to be "huge" for the PCVR market, just like the Index was when it released. Maybe we're all coping, and we probably even are, but I think a lot of people are generally unhappy with the state of the PCVR hardware market right now.
So all this is to say... I really hope this thing is much better than a glorified flat screen projector.
If you don't want to open this and solder a chip, then no, you can't do what you want.
The closest you can get is to enable AutoRCM, which will cause the Switch to always boot into recovery mode and accept a payload. This skips the need to use a jig in the Joy-Con rail, but you still need to inject a payload. And because recovery mode is just a black screen, you don't have any visual feedback to know if the Switch is actually in recovery mode, or if the battery is just dead.
Your best option is to just boot into whatever OS you use most, then make it a habit to keep it charged enough to not shut down.
Be careful, that's an AI generated review. Definitely try to find other human reviews before you buy it.