umbraroze

joined 2 years ago
[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

There are a lot of people who go "I tried to learn X through Duolingo and failed". Sure, that's probably true, because staring at the app is not how language learning works. Much like 100 years ago, people would have said you can't learn a language by reading a single book.

Duolingo is great for basics of the language, vocabulary and constant daily lessons. But you always need more. There's a whole language sphere out there. People actually using the language and whatnot.

I started studying French through Duolingo and about 6 months later I was like "I really need a grammar book and a dictionary, dammit". Year in, I was like "I should try reading news in French and maybe try a book."

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep and a lot of people get it wrong. It's not the "Sonic the Hedgehog protein" but "Sonic hedgehog protein", as in hedgehog protein that is Sonic. It's clearly distinct in meaning, and therefore completely different. As the original discoverer of the gene put it, "original protein name, do not steal".

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, the thing is, "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors" is kind of a meme among non-Haskell developers. Personally, I think Haskell is a very interesting language. The mathematical jargon, however, is impenetrable, and this particular expression is kind of the poster child. I'mma go look at Erlang if I want my functional language fix without making my head hurt, thank ye very much.

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

It's a thing! Sadly it won't rewrite Haskell codebases for you, though.

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You got a 5 pack of VHS tapes? When I was a kid, I once got one VHS tape as a Christmas gift. And it was awesome. Because it had a plastic cover and everything.

Still sits on my childhood home shelf, with that Christmas episode of Garfield and Friends at the beginning. Can't remember what else I recorded on it.

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm from Finland. This is how it usually goes in the winter:

During the 2 hours of daylight we get at this latitude:

  • Ooooooh this is pretty
  • Bet I can get some nice photographs
  • ...or I would, if the sky wasn't overcast goddamn it

Other times:

  • Rummaging through the closet for wool socks and more clothing
  • Put on the headphones, hit the metal music collection on my Nokia, and face the Darkness with a grim stare
  • Would hit the beer, but not in this economy
[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Back in the day, I had an application that could decode teletext from a TV capture card. And there are PC based DTV receivers that can also do that.

And over here in Finland, the national public broadcaster has the teletext on web. (Yle is the last network to put any effort in teletext - the commercial channels like MTV3 and Nelonen used to have a whole bunch of teletext stuff like premium SMS based chats, but those aren't really all that profitable these days. I think MTV3 still has that, but they're shutting it down next year.)

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I literally just looked at Reddit for the first time in ages.

What the fuck.

Here's the thing: Reddit's UI design has always been shitty. Old Reddit was fucking garbage, so admins cheerfully asked RES folks to fix their shit. (Instead of, you know, hiring them.) New Reddit? Always been shit, and nobody's going to fix it.

This Newer New Reddit? I... I don't think they even know at this point. What. What's going on.

If they ask critique from the community, some AI bot will AI-pat the admin's arse and AI-splain the remaining AI-users that things will be just fine. (Now, "things actually getting better" has literally never happened as far as Reddit or its user interface has ever been concerned, as you should well know if you've ever been a human Reddit user.)

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of another old joke: "My doctor said I have the lungs of a little old lady. The upside is that I know that little old ladies never die."

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Nappasin kamerakassin ja menin katsomaan Puolustusvoimien paraatia Raatille. Kardinaalimunauksena jäi villasukat ottamatta. Eivät ne jalat onneksi ihan kokonaan jäätyneet. Hyviä kuvia tuli.

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

What comes to the conclusion of the video: Maybe it's just I've got some weird Spectrum Genes, but when I was a kid and early adult, I was fucking paralysed by the idea that all of my jokes were basically stolen. 20 years later, I think I've developed A Style, but in the off chance I remember a directly quoted joke, I'm fucking deliberately saying it's a stolen joke, every time.

Also, one of the things that I've learned this year, as exemplified by this video, is that just because you're in a marginalised community doesn't mean you're automatically a saint. Seen plenty of people just doing a dum-dum. Don't do dumb things. Makes you look dumb. Makes your community look dumb too. Know what I mean? I'm looking at you.

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My theoretical answer is this: in an ideal world, there would be no copyright at all. This is an artificial contrivance that was once dreamed up to serve physical-copy economy, and it was rendered obsolete by the digital age. Shit would be so much easier when we got rid of this shit and everyone could share everything by default without any profit motive. (Caveat: This will not work unless literally every jurisdiction on the planet gets rid of copyright laws all at once, otherwise this is way too exploitable due to power imbalance. So I don't think this is a practical proposition. *cough* unless we all decide Anarchism is a good idea after all *cough*)

My practical answer is this: Welllllll we're kinda damned if we do and we're damned if we don't. My personal feeling is that AI creations aren't really copyrightable, and even suggesting they are copyrightable is kind of opening a huge can of worms regarding what exactly counts as "creativity" in the first place. The best we can do under current copyright regime is to regulate how the AI datasets are curated, because goodness knows the current datasets weren't exactly ethically obtained.

view more: ‹ prev next ›