veer66

Yes, I've used this.

properly parametrized and escaped and all that

I'm not sure if what I use is proper enough in your sense. So, can you elaborate more?

RK3588 is used in many Linux devices, but I'm not sure if Rockchip is in the BDS list. I don't know which factory was RK3588 from.

I heard that Linux gets new patches for Loongson, but I didn't try it yet.

Yes, it is stable.

  #[allow(unused_assignments)]

Thank you. This works!

It doesn't work, at least, on rustc 1.75.

Clippy didn't tell anything about the macro.

warning: dereferencing a tuple pattern where every element takes a reference
  --> src/lib.rs:13:9
   |
13 |         &Some(ref cons_rc) => {
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#needless_borrowed_reference
   = note: `#[warn(clippy::needless_borrowed_reference)]` on by default
help: try removing the `&` and `ref` parts
   |
13 -         &Some(ref cons_rc) => {
13 +         Some(cons_rc) => {
   |

To put #[allow(this_linting_rule)] like this:

    [ $x:expr, $( $y:expr ),* ] => {
	#[allow(unused_assignments)]
	{

I got error[E0658]: attributes on expressions are experimental.

To put it like this:

#[macro_export]
#[allow(unused_assignments)]
macro_rules! list {
    () => {
	None

It doesn't work.

Because of the Redhat incident, I started to see people asking for community-based distros without a corporate that dominates the community. And, Mageia is one of them. So, I hope it will be more popular.

• KDE is the default. So, for KDE users, Mageia with KDE was tested.
• Mageia comes with Drake tools for configuring almost everything. IMO *drakes look quite friendly. Since they have been around for 20+ years, they must be stable.
• Each release will be supported for 18 months, which is longer than Fedora.

Such files are relatively easy to create and read, as they are basically shell scripts.

I agree. I lean towards writing in Bash script instead of learning yet another special-purpose language. Nonetheless, the RPM spec doesn't seem to pose any additional difficulty.

The immutability and configuration of Nix seems so appealing but at this point I’m really comfortable with Arch and it does everything I need in a pretty sane way so idk if I’d switch anytime soon.

Back in 2018, I had the experience of using NixOS. At that time, I noticed that the Nix language had a striking resemblance to Haskell, which stirred up feelings of anxiety within me.