whosepoopisonmybuttocks

joined 1 month ago

I'd say the silliness seen here goes hand-in-hand with curiosity and intelligence, which makes them clever and effective hunters. This type of derpiness also earns them a rent free spot in monkey houses. So, dumb as it may seem, this is actually a very fit behavior.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's obviously not him but the guy sounds slightly like Tom Green.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm definitely not an expert here and it sounds like you probably know more about this than I do. In my experience, android phones I've bought come with google play already installed and cell carrier bloatware. When you turn on the phone for the first time, one of the first steps is setting up your Google account.

If your point is that you can get around all this with stock android and you don't specifically need grapheneOS, you're probably right.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think the point was that its an issue on phones with a standard android setup.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

I think the problem is that once your phone knows its location from GPS, google and apps can access this data. The data is then shared with advertisers and also, you know, government agencies.

Unfortunately, even just the names of nearby WiFi networks and Bluetooth connections can be used to determine location. If apps and google services have access to this info, they still have location data on you, even with your cell and GPS radios disabled.

Supposedly GOS doesn't allow google or apps to access the location data unless you allow it, which is nice.

It's fun to pee at full power, but that's how you end up with a varicose vein in your testicle.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He got famous in 2003 with "get rich or die trying."

According to the calculator on the us bureau of labor statics website, something that would have cost 50 cents in 2003 would cost 89 cents today.

50 cents has lost 44% of its value since 2003.

https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=.5&year1=200301&year2=202508

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While it seems people are unhappy that your comment doesn't apply specifically to Linux phones, I found your comment informative.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Is the /j so we know you're being a jerk?

(Seriously though, what does that mean?)

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Its not about just their current taxes. Its about systemic change that democratic socialists gaining a foothold might create. The very wealthy would be made to pay for social programs and this would cause them to lose some of the obscene wealth they've hoarded.

At this point, spending some money to prevent this from happening is just financial risk management. It's their fiduciary duty.

As a note: I hope Mamdani wins.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Knives, cutting boards, measuring devices, mixing bowls. Are you just having scrambled eggs for every meal?

view more: next ›