#SUTOM #1314 6/6
π₯π¦π¦π¦π¦π‘π¦π¦π¦
π₯π‘π‘π‘π‘π¦π¦π‘π¦
π₯π‘π‘π¦π¦π¦π¦π₯π¦
π₯π‘π‘π‘π‘π¦π¦π¦π₯
π₯π₯π₯π¦π‘π‘π‘π‘π¦
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
Chaud patate π₯
Linux does support TPM and secure boot: https://wiki/ .debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot.3F
So the problem is really only about kernel level anticheat, not the secure boot itself ?
La guerre des Γ©toiles Γ©pisode 1.
J'Γ©tais un giga fan de Star Wars et overhypΓ©.
Le film Γ©tait un screener en anglais sans sous-titres et je ne captais rien. L'intrigue pourrie Γ base d'embargo commercial n'aidant pas.
Star Wars est mort pour moi ce jour lΓ .
Thanks for the explanation.
I totally forgot about the endianness.
I am not a C developer, but I found the "helper has a terrible name" and "it's not clear what the helper is doing" arguments a bit weak.
Who in they right mind does not think the helper creates a 32 bytes word by putting the 16 bytes of the first argument followed by the 16 bytes of the second one ?
I am not sure about this conspiracy theory of yours: Microsoft does not want third party applications in the kernel space anymore.
https://www.theverge.com/news/692637/microsoft-windows-kernel-antivirus-changes
I don't understand this point.
Linux does support TPM and secure boot: https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot.3F
I thought the problem for Linux players was "just" the kernel anticheat ?
Same here. I generally wait for the first point release.
However this time, I also have to wait for LMDE 7 which should come in September.
Shame that the Linux Mint is focusing on the Ubuntu-based version. LMDE, despite it's greatness, still feels like a "plan b".
The guy in glasses is holding some porn magazines I guess
This is a pretty awesome question that I never considered.
My guess would be "magnets".
Try to get the deluxe version with the Mooncrash DLC, as the DLC alone is often expensive.