This is fucking awesome
woop_woop
joined 1 year ago
Grammatically, it doesn't say that. An act of aggression or a nuclear blah blah is vague enough that you can read it with or without a comma
That's not badly written. Thats intentionally vague so one can justify a lot of different responses. That's how these things work
It's been the consistent recommendation since day 1.
There is a difference between approaching a solution with "no, it's not good enough" and "good, now let's make it better". It's not really different if you strip feeling out of it, but in a greater context, that feeling means something.
I agree with your responses, but you're overall using the former technique. That will rub people wrong and spark conflict.
Rape is an actual crime in the UK, it's not a crime by name in New Jersey. They're being consistent with charges based on the jurisdiction.
...is facing at least 10 years in prison if found guilty of first-degree aggravated sexual assault, second-degree sexual assault, and second-degree endangerment to the welfare of a child...
Those are the legal terms for different kinds of rape.
L O V E
O
V
E
Is what it would be, and the pic is someone obviously making it wrong on purpose
Why would you spread this? That's the point of these things, to get a reaction out of people and get it seen by more people.
Stop making shit worse
Son of gold would be "goldson". "Goldman" would be a moniker for someone who worked with gold (miner, jeweler, gilder) or possessed/wore a lot of it.
view more: next ›
Context matters. Always. One person can use a word and it will be not racist, another can use the same term and it will be racist. You should ask the person what they define as "civilized". Their reasoning is your answer.