I guess when I say "ask" I mean we run better candidates instead of going with whatever the Democrats decide for us. Expecting people to show up and vote for what they have dished out in the past isn't working. As you said, we will need a multifaceted approach .
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
Being inflammatory is not the same as someone complaining about an unjust government nor is it the same as feeling bad about something. It is a rhetorical strategy that is not suited for bridging misunderstandings and that is why such content gets removed from their platforms.
Honestly this is a good response because it is asking good questions.
The AI is just an excuse, laying off people makes the stock go up because we have so many monopolies. What politicians are afraid of is people won't buy their bullshit and start rioting for real.
I'm sorry but it is naive to think that misinformed voters will learn the right lesson and vote blue no matter who. It is more practical to ask for better candidates.
I am currently reading a book (Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers) by a CCP member and he talks about:
- The merits of Democracy
- Tienamen Square
- A better leadership style for China than what they have
So you can talk about these things, but what isn't allowed is being inflammatory.
Is this before or after the Lord commanded them not to wear mixed fabrics?
They are not even thinking that deep. They just think handing assholes with power even more power is how to create more prosperity.
Ehh, there was the parlamenterian that blocked student debt relief: https://thehill.com/opinion/education/550677-change-in-reconciliation-rules-takes-pressure-off-biden-to-forgive-student/
What's another war crime for these people? Tuesday?
Ehh, China is increasingly caring about it's international image, and there's always backroom deals.
I would not survive this but I am willing to sacrifice as tribute to break the cycle.